From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [GIT PULL tools] Linux kernel memory model Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:08:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20180131100822.GL2269@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180125093440.GA875@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180129065724.ybrdsabvktq7fbqg@gmail.com> <20180129095449.GT3741@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180131090006.onaopgyqthppoysi@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180131090006.onaopgyqthppoysi@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@gmail.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr, boqun.feng@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, elena.reshetova@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, akiyks@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:00:06AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > - Similary, some of the high level descriptions in tools/memory-model/README > should probably propagated into the source code files as well: for example > both tools/memory-model/lock.cat and linux-kernel.cat could be improved that > way. This is something both Will and me have on our todo list, sadly we've not had any time to work on this due to this pesky spectre crap.