From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:22:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180201152244.GC31080@flask> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f49453f2-223e-abe0-912a-7288183a1671@redhat.com>
2018-02-01 09:21-0500, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 01/02/2018 08:22, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Christoffer,
> >
> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 11:47:07 +0100 Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> While the suggested fix is functional it does result in some code
> >> duplication, and the better resolution is the following:
> >
> > OK, I will use that resolution form tomorrow on.
> >
> > Someone needs to remember to let Linus know when the pull request is
> > sent.
>
> It should be fixed in the KVM tree before it reaches Linus (when we
> merge a topic branch that is common between x86/pti & KVM).
I wasn't sure if the pti top branch is final, so I pulled hyper-v topic
branch that also also contains v4.15. This and the SEV feature
conflicts should be gone now,
thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-01 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 1:55 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 10:47 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-01 13:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 14:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-01 14:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-01 15:22 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2018-02-01 15:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-02 0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-02 17:22 ` Radim Krčmář
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-10 1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13 6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13 6:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-09 0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-13 3:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-30 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-22 4:29 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-17 2:56 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-02 2:36 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-02 8:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-02 10:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-24 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:16 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-04 2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-18 2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15 4:24 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15 4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06 5:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-04 7:04 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-05 2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-05 1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-25 21:07 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 3:48 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 11:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 12:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 12:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 12:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-29 4:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-29 10:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-25 4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04 6:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-27 4:50 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-27 4:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25 7:25 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09 6:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-02 5:05 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-02 5:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-01 2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-07 3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-02 5:52 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-12 4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-06 5:12 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-13 3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27 1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27 16:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-11-06 0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01 7:10 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-07-01 7:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-01 12:30 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-01 15:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-07-01 12:31 ` Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180201152244.GC31080@flask \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.