From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752021AbeBDMM0 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 4 Feb 2018 07:12:26 -0500
Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:34031 "EHLO
        youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751806AbeBDMMQ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 4 Feb 2018 07:12:16 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227sVNOnkfDQNreSf5DcEAghwqHcLhaX+yM8DequKqBHHu9CmgcvFWp6ndaXBC/jEj4gumpjPg==
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 13:12:08 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, jbenc@redhat.com,
        nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1 v1] rtnetlink: require unique netns identifier
Message-ID: <20180204121207.GB1344@gmail.com>
References: <20180203132904.11972-1-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
 <20180203132904.11972-2-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
 <20180203111701.2ff8d7a3@xeon-e3>
 <0e8a86e6-5948-1e91-d937-893eb62ceef1@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0e8a86e6-5948-1e91-d937-893eb62ceef1@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 07:09:55PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/3/18 12:17 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sat,  3 Feb 2018 14:29:04 +0100
> > Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> +static int rtnl_ensure_unique_netns_attr(const struct sock *sk,
> >> +					 struct nlattr *tb[],
> >> +					 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >> +{
> >> +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> >> +	struct net *net = NULL, *unique_net = NULL;
> >> +
> >> +	/* Requests without network namespace ids have been able to specify
> >> +	 * multiple properties referring to different network namespaces so
> >> +	 * don't regress them.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	if (!tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID])
> >> +		return 0;
> >> +
> >> +	if (!tb[IFLA_NET_NS_PID] && !tb[IFLA_NET_NS_FD])
> >> +		return 0;
> > 
> > Isn't this an error?
> > 
> >> +
> >> +	unique_net = get_net_ns_by_id(sock_net(sk), nla_get_s32(tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID]));
> >> +	if (!unique_net)
> >> +		return -1;
> > 
> > Other paths are returning errno, so why -1 here?
> > 
> 
> extack needs to be filled in too.

Yeah, it should report that an invalid network namespace identifier has
been specified.

Thanks!
Christian