All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix a race between resetting the timer and completion handling
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:06:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180205210601.GP1121507@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180201224930.17918-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>

Hello, Bart.

Thanks a lot for testing and fixing the issues but I'm a bit confused
by the patch.  Maybe we can split patch a bit more?  There seem to be
three things going on,

1. Changing preemption protection to irq protection in issue path.

2. Merge of aborted_gstate_sync and gstate_seq.

3. Updates to blk_mq_rq_timed_out().

Are all three changes necessary for stability?

> @@ -831,13 +834,12 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_timed_out(struct request *req, bool reserved)
>  		__blk_mq_complete_request(req);
>  		break;
>  	case BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER:
> -		/*
> -		 * As nothing prevents from completion happening while
> -		 * ->aborted_gstate is set, this may lead to ignored
> -		 * completions and further spurious timeouts.
> -		 */
> -		blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(req, 0);
> +		local_irq_disable();
> +		write_seqcount_begin(&req->gstate_seq);
>  		blk_add_timer(req);
> +		req->aborted_gstate = 0;
> +		write_seqcount_end(&req->gstate_seq);
> +		local_irq_enable();
>  		break;

So, this is #3 and I'm not sure how adding gstate_seq protection gets
rid of the race condition mentioned in the comment.  It's still the
same that nothing is protecting against racing w/ completion.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-05 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-01 22:49 [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix a race between resetting the timer and completion handling Bart Van Assche
2018-02-05 21:06 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-02-05 21:33   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-05 21:37     ` tj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180205210601.GP1121507@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.