From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: adobriyan@gmail.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [merged] proc-spread-likely-unlikely-a-bit.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 11:56:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207195618.cdi9rwO2C%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: proc: spread likely/unlikely a bit
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
proc-spread-likely-unlikely-a-bit.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: proc: spread likely/unlikely a bit
use_pde() is used at every open/read/write/... of every random /proc
file. Negative refcount happens only if PDE is being deleted by module
(read: never). So it gets "likely".
unuse_pde() gets "unlikely" for the same reason.
close_pdeo() gets unlikely as the completion is filled only if there is a
race between PDE removal and close() (read: never ever).
It even saves code on x86_64 defconfig:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 2/-20 (-18)
Function old new delta
close_pdeo 183 185 +2
proc_reg_get_unmapped_area 119 111 -8
proc_reg_poll 85 73 -12
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180104175657.GA5204@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/proc/inode.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/proc/inode.c~proc-spread-likely-unlikely-a-bit fs/proc/inode.c
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c~proc-spread-likely-unlikely-a-bit
+++ a/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -129,12 +129,12 @@ enum {BIAS = -1U<<31};
static inline int use_pde(struct proc_dir_entry *pde)
{
- return atomic_inc_unless_negative(&pde->in_use);
+ return likely(atomic_inc_unless_negative(&pde->in_use));
}
static void unuse_pde(struct proc_dir_entry *pde)
{
- if (atomic_dec_return(&pde->in_use) == BIAS)
+ if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(&pde->in_use) == BIAS))
complete(pde->pde_unload_completion);
}
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static void close_pdeo(struct proc_dir_e
spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
/* After ->release. */
list_del(&pdeo->lh);
- if (pdeo->c)
+ if (unlikely(pdeo->c))
complete(pdeo->c);
kfree(pdeo);
}
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static const char *proc_get_link(struct
struct delayed_call *done)
{
struct proc_dir_entry *pde = PDE(inode);
- if (unlikely(!use_pde(pde)))
+ if (!use_pde(pde))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
set_delayed_call(done, proc_put_link, pde);
return pde->data;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from adobriyan@gmail.com are
seq_file-delete-small-value-optimization.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-02-07 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180207195618.cdi9rwO2C%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.