From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
To: whiteheadm@acm.org
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86 : i486 reporting to be vulnerable to Meltdown/Spectre_V1/Spectre_V2
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 09:41:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201802090941.41782.linux@rainbow-software.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8WD_YujTxLjMD_iXMzmC0V=JVPZQtXfqD7aEEr-+SVaUaaLg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday 08 February 2018, tedheadster wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:02 PM, David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> >
> >> Sent: 08 February 2018 15:23
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> The Winchip is what eventually turned into the VIA Nano, which does
> >> have speculative execution, but I don't think the earlier C3 and C7 did,
> >> they are much closer to the original Winchip design.
> >
> > We had terrible trouble getting (IIRC) the C7 to execute functions
> > that were called in 16bit mode and returned in 32bit mode and v.v.
> > (for boot code bios calls).
> > The problems seemed to imply that it was caching return addresses
> > and the translation (to uops) of the instructions that followed.
> > So it would effectively decode the first few bytes in the wrong mode.
> > So there might be scope for one of these attacks.
> >
> > OTOH these devices were so slow that I doubt any are used for anything
> > serious - and certainly won't get a kernel update even if they are.
> >
> > Also worth nothing that the difference between the cpu and memory
> > speeds is much lower - so far fewer instructions could be speculatively
> > executed while waiting a cache miss.
> >
> > Tempting to disable everything.
> >
> > David
>
> You might think this absolutely crazy, but I would be willing to test
> such systems if I can get my hands on the needed hardware that I lack.
> I am already doing sanity testing on Intel
> i486/i586/i586-MMX/i686-PentiumPro systems, I just don't have the
> clone cpus (Cyrix, etc).
>
> While few people are using the 32bit kernel, I don't think we want to
> kill it completely just yet.
>
> - Matthew
I have a working Cyrix MII (was actively using it last year, now upgraded to a
P3-based Celeron). Some AMD CPUs too - K6(maybe -2 or -3?), not sure about K5
and also a Rise mP6. But never got a WinChip.
So the question is: what to test?
BTW. Kernel was not able to identify mP6 CPU 6 years ago, patches were
ignored.
--
Ondrej Zary
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-09 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-03 4:52 [BUG] x86 : i486 reporting to be vulnerable to Meltdown/Spectre_V1/Spectre_V2 tedheadster
2018-02-03 7:37 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-06 18:33 ` tedheadster
2018-02-06 19:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-02-06 19:10 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-06 19:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-02-06 19:17 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-06 19:24 ` tedheadster
2018-02-06 20:45 ` tedheadster
2018-02-06 20:54 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-06 22:11 ` tedheadster
2018-02-07 8:18 ` Ondrej Zary
2018-02-08 13:49 ` Alan Cox
2018-02-08 15:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-02-08 17:02 ` David Laight
2018-02-08 17:27 ` tedheadster
2018-02-08 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-02-09 8:41 ` Ondrej Zary [this message]
2018-02-13 21:04 ` Pavel Machek
2018-02-15 9:53 ` What was last kernel that booted on hardware XY? database was Re: [BUG] x86 : i486 reporting to be vulnerable to Meltdown/Spectre_V1/Spectre_V2A Pavel Machek
2018-02-15 13:16 ` tedheadster
2018-02-17 21:16 ` Pavel Machek
2018-02-17 22:39 ` tedheadster
2018-02-23 8:07 ` Pavel Machek
2018-02-08 17:50 ` [BUG] x86 : i486 reporting to be vulnerable to Meltdown/Spectre_V1/Spectre_V2 tedheadster
2018-02-08 20:52 ` Alan Cox
2018-02-13 21:04 ` Pavel Machek
2018-02-13 23:45 ` Alan Cox
2018-02-08 21:16 ` Alan Cox
2018-02-08 21:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-02-06 21:59 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201802090941.41782.linux@rainbow-software.org \
--to=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=eduval@amazon.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=whiteheadm@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.