From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752284AbeBJJUJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Feb 2018 04:20:09 -0500 Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:40480 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750884AbeBJJUI (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Feb 2018 04:20:08 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 10:20:03 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-kernel , Robert Abel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] auxdisplay: charlcd: fix hex literal ranges for graphics command Message-ID: <20180210092003.GA20377@1wt.eu> References: <20180209235012.4993-1-rabel@robertabel.eu> <20180209235012.4993-2-rabel@robertabel.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Miguel, On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 09:58:44AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:50 AM, Robert Abel wrote: > > The graphics command expects 16 hexadecimal literals, but would allow characters in range [0-9a-zA-Z] instead of [0-9a-fA-F]. > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Abel > > --- > > drivers/auxdisplay/charlcd.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/auxdisplay/charlcd.c b/drivers/auxdisplay/charlcd.c > > index 642afd88870b..324d02f9f1c5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/auxdisplay/charlcd.c > > +++ b/drivers/auxdisplay/charlcd.c > > @@ -441,9 +441,9 @@ static inline int handle_lcd_special_code(struct charlcd *lcd) > > shift ^= 4; > > if (*esc >= '0' && *esc <= '9') { > > value |= (*esc - '0') << shift; > > - } else if (*esc >= 'A' && *esc <= 'Z') { > > + } else if (*esc >= 'A' && *esc <= 'F') { > > value |= (*esc - 'A' + 10) << shift; > > - } else if (*esc >= 'a' && *esc <= 'z') { > > + } else if (*esc >= 'a' && *esc <= 'f') { > > Willy, Geert: this seems obvious, but do you know if the broader range > was intended for some reason? No, I think it was simply a brain fart from me 14 years ago, as I can find it as well in the original 0.9.0 patch for kernel 2.4! Ack from me on this patch. Willy