diff for duplicates of <20180210155734.708d01b6@archlinux> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 2c97055..fc10879 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 06:59:43 -0800 -Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: +Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 14:53 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > While it would be great to improve checkpatches false diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index e80ddb8..48e627a 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,25 +5,26 @@ "ref\0f008911b-c595-6e0f-d85f-076e994ae7db@users.sourceforge.net\0" "ref\020180210145336.233c721d@archlinux\0" "ref\01518274783.6579.2.camel@perches.com\0" - "From\0Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>\0" + "ref\01518274783.6579.2.camel-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org\0" + "From\0Jonathan Cameron <jic23-tko9wxEg+fIOOJlXag/Snyp2UmYkHbXO@public.gmane.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: Software evolution around \342\200\234checkpatch.pl\342\200\235?\0" "Date\0Sat, 10 Feb 2018 15:57:34 +0000\0" - "To\0Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>\0" - "Cc\0SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>" - linux-iio@vger.kernel.org - linux-input@vger.kernel.org - Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de> - Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net> - Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - " kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org\0" + "To\0Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>\0" + "Cc\0SF Markus Elfring <elfring-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>" + linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org + Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> + Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org> + Jiri Kosina <jikos-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> + Lars-Peter Clausen <lars-Qo5EllUWu/uELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> + Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw-jW+XmwGofnusTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org> + Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> + LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> + " kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 06:59:43 -0800\n" - "Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:\n" + "Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" "\n" "> On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 14:53 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:\n" "> > While it would be great to improve checkpatches false\n" @@ -57,4 +58,4 @@ "\n" Jonathan -04f11a52f4a58810702ec2e89ba9be28325cf9cdbd3053ff505b76e8bce41260 +994468372161f465860b7f05e92bdd3f7759ce98534aacc059489105445ea24c
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 2c97055..b3acdd2 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 14:53 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > While it would be great to improve checkpatches false > > positive rate, it's very nature as a string matcher makes -> > this hard. -> +> > this hard. =20 +>=20 > true. -> +>=20 > what are the false positives you see? -> +>=20 This particular case is only 'sort of' a false positive in the warning that a message printed on a memory allocation failure 'may' not add any information over the generic case. @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ Very hard to judge on whether it is useful to know more than an allocation failed somewhere or not. Message makes this clear: ->“WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message” ->(from the script “checkpatch.pl”) +>=E2=80=9CWARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message=E2=80=9D +>(from the script =E2=80=9Ccheckpatch.pl=E2=80=9D) =20 We also have the balance between any changes to existing code adding 'some' maintenance overhead vs changing this stuff diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index e80ddb8..a0cee1e 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -28,12 +28,12 @@ "> On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 14:53 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:\n" "> > While it would be great to improve checkpatches false\n" "> > positive rate, it's very nature as a string matcher makes\n" - "> > this hard. \n" - "> \n" + "> > this hard. =20\n" + ">=20\n" "> true.\n" - "> \n" + ">=20\n" "> what are the false positives you see?\n" - "> \n" + ">=20\n" "This particular case is only 'sort of' a false positive\n" "in the warning that a message printed on a memory allocation\n" "failure 'may' not add any information over the generic case.\n" @@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ "an allocation failed somewhere or not.\n" "\n" "Message makes this clear:\n" - ">\342\200\234WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message\342\200\235\n" - ">(from the script \342\200\234checkpatch.pl\342\200\235) \n" + ">=E2=80=9CWARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message=E2=80=9D\n" + ">(from the script =E2=80=9Ccheckpatch.pl=E2=80=9D) =20\n" "\n" "We also have the balance between any changes to existing code\n" "adding 'some' maintenance overhead vs changing this stuff\n" @@ -57,4 +57,4 @@ "\n" Jonathan -04f11a52f4a58810702ec2e89ba9be28325cf9cdbd3053ff505b76e8bce41260 +4b1c8f4fde209b3baabc6104be3e15b64405fe8a631eea7ed8e9c42d6716d651
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.