From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Uprobe: Bug(?) when probing small binaries
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:19:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212151935.GA12577@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e74318e0-0cdf-e55d-bf06-b481541e2697@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Ravi,
On 02/12, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
> I'm observing a bug in the uprobe infrastructure.
I am not sure,
> When target binary
> is quite small, uprobe replaces 'trap' instruction at two different
> places. Ex,
but this is actually "the same place" (in the file), just 2 virtual addrs differ,
> (gdb) x/w 0x1001069c
> 0x1001069c: 2080899750
>
> Now enable the probe:
>
> # echo 1 > events/probe_a/main/enable
>
> Check probed instruction:
>
> (gdb) disassemble main
> 0x000000001000069c <+8>: trap
>
> *Bug*:
>
> (gdb) x/w 0x1001069c
> 0x1001069c: 2145386504
>
> In short, when it replaces the probe instruction, it does some corruption
> in the readonly vma. This seems to be a bug.
>
> How did I get the other address 0x1001069c?I found build_map_info()
> returns these two vmas for the single probe:
>
> 10000000-10010000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 67325595 /home/ravi/a.out
> 10010000-10020000 r--p 00000000 08:05 67325595 /home/ravi/a.out
please note that these 2 vma's mmap the same region in a.out, so
*0x1001069c and *0x1000069c point to the same insn.
Oleg.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-12 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 13:16 Uprobe: Bug(?) when probing small binaries Ravi Bangoria
2018-02-12 15:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180212151935.GA12577@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.