All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
To: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: light: lv0104cs: Add support for LV0104CS light sensor
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:46:42 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180215044642.GA18079@labundy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1802141633300.9148@vps.pmeerw.net>

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 04:58:22PM +0100, Peter Meerwald-Stadler wrote:
> 
> > This patch adds support for the On Semiconductor LV0104CS ambient
> > light sensor.
> 
> nice little driver, some comments below

Thank you very much for the review; I agree with your feedback and will
submit a v2. Comments and answers in line.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/light/Kconfig    |  10 +
> >  drivers/iio/light/Makefile   |   1 +
> >  drivers/iio/light/lv0104cs.c | 559 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 570 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/light/lv0104cs.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/light/Kconfig
> > index 2356ed9..ca8918e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/light/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/Kconfig
> > @@ -275,6 +275,16 @@ config LTR501
> >  	 This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
> >           will be called ltr501.
> >  
> > +config LV0104CS
> > +	tristate "LV0104CS Ambient Light Sensor"
> > +	depends on I2C
> > +	help
> > +	 Say Y here if you want to build support for the LV0104CS ambient
> > +	 light sensor.
> 
> maybe mention On Semi somewhere?

Sure thing, will do.
> 
> > +
> > +	 To compile this driver as a module, choose M here:
> > +	 the module will be called lv0104cs.
> > +
> >  config MAX44000
> >  	tristate "MAX44000 Ambient and Infrared Proximity Sensor"
> >  	depends on I2C
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/Makefile b/drivers/iio/light/Makefile
> > index fa32fa4..77c8682 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/light/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/Makefile
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ISL29125)		+= isl29125.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_JSA1212)		+= jsa1212.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_LM3533)	+= lm3533-als.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_LTR501)		+= ltr501.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_LV0104CS)		+= lv0104cs.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MAX44000)		+= max44000.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_OPT3001)		+= opt3001.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_PA12203001)	+= pa12203001.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/lv0104cs.c b/drivers/iio/light/lv0104cs.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..ecbba39
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/lv0104cs.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,559 @@
> > +/*
> > + * lv0104cs.c: LV0104CS Ambient Light Sensor Driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2018 Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 of the License
> > + * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> > + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
> > + * more details.
> > + *
> > + * 7-bit I2C slave address: 0x13
> > + *
> > + * This device has just one register and it is write-only. Read operations are
> > + * limited to the 16-bit ADC output.
> 
> as simple as it gets :)
> 
> a link to the documentation would be nice

Sure thing, will do.
> 
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
> > +
> > +#define LV0104CS_REGVAL_MEASURE		0xE0
> > +#define LV0104CS_REGVAL_SLEEP		0x00
> > +
> > +#define LV0104CS_HWGAIN_0x25		0
> > +#define LV0104CS_HWGAIN_1x		1
> > +#define LV0104CS_HWGAIN_2x		2
> > +#define LV0104CS_HWGAIN_8x		3
> > +
> > +#define LV0104CS_INTEG_12m5		0
> > +#define LV0104CS_INTEG_100m		1
> > +#define LV0104CS_INTEG_200m		2
> 
> are these milliseconds? maybe annotate

They are, and I will.
> 
> > +
> > +#define LV0104CS_CALIB_UNITY		31
> > +
> > +struct lv0104cs_private {
> > +	struct i2c_client *client;
> > +	struct mutex lock;
> > +	unsigned char hardwaregain;
> > +	unsigned char int_time;
> > +	unsigned char calibscale;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct lv0104cs_mapping {
> > +	int val;
> > +	int val2;
> > +	unsigned char regval;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct lv0104cs_mapping lv0104cs_calibscales[] = {
> > +	{ 0, 666666, 0x81 },
> > +	{ 0, 800000, 0x82 },
> > +	{ 0, 857142, 0x83 },
> > +	{ 0, 888888, 0x84 },
> > +	{ 0, 909090, 0x85 },
> > +	{ 0, 923076, 0x86 },
> > +	{ 0, 933333, 0x87 },
> > +	{ 0, 941176, 0x88 },
> > +	{ 0, 947368, 0x89 },
> > +	{ 0, 952380, 0x8A },
> > +	{ 0, 956521, 0x8B },
> > +	{ 0, 960000, 0x8C },
> > +	{ 0, 962962, 0x8D },
> > +	{ 0, 965517, 0x8E },
> > +	{ 0, 967741, 0x8F },
> > +	{ 0, 969696, 0x90 },
> > +	{ 0, 971428, 0x91 },
> > +	{ 0, 972972, 0x92 },
> > +	{ 0, 974358, 0x93 },
> > +	{ 0, 975609, 0x94 },
> > +	{ 0, 976744, 0x95 },
> > +	{ 0, 977777, 0x96 },
> > +	{ 0, 978723, 0x97 },
> > +	{ 0, 979591, 0x98 },
> > +	{ 0, 980392, 0x99 },
> > +	{ 0, 981132, 0x9A },
> > +	{ 0, 981818, 0x9B },
> > +	{ 0, 982456, 0x9C },
> > +	{ 0, 983050, 0x9D },
> > +	{ 0, 983606, 0x9E },
> > +	{ 0, 984126, 0x9F },
> > +	{ 1, 0, 0x80 },
> > +	{ 1, 16129, 0xBF },
> > +	{ 1, 16666, 0xBE },
> > +	{ 1, 17241, 0xBD },
> > +	{ 1, 17857, 0xBC },
> > +	{ 1, 18518, 0xBB },
> > +	{ 1, 19230, 0xBA },
> > +	{ 1, 20000, 0xB9 },
> > +	{ 1, 20833, 0xB8 },
> > +	{ 1, 21739, 0xB7 },
> > +	{ 1, 22727, 0xB6 },
> > +	{ 1, 23809, 0xB5 },
> > +	{ 1, 24999, 0xB4 },
> > +	{ 1, 26315, 0xB3 },
> > +	{ 1, 27777, 0xB2 },
> > +	{ 1, 29411, 0xB1 },
> > +	{ 1, 31250, 0xB0 },
> > +	{ 1, 33333, 0xAF },
> > +	{ 1, 35714, 0xAE },
> > +	{ 1, 38461, 0xAD },
> > +	{ 1, 41666, 0xAC },
> > +	{ 1, 45454, 0xAB },
> > +	{ 1, 50000, 0xAA },
> > +	{ 1, 55555, 0xA9 },
> > +	{ 1, 62500, 0xA8 },
> > +	{ 1, 71428, 0xA7 },
> > +	{ 1, 83333, 0xA6 },
> > +	{ 1, 100000, 0xA5 },
> > +	{ 1, 125000, 0xA4 },
> > +	{ 1, 166666, 0xA3 },
> > +	{ 1, 250000, 0xA2 },
> > +	{ 1, 500000, 0xA1 },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct lv0104cs_mapping lv0104cs_hardwaregains[] = {
> > +	{ 0, 250000, 0x00 },
> > +	{ 1, 0, 0x08 },
> > +	{ 2, 0, 0x10 },
> > +	{ 8, 0, 0x18 },
> > +};
> 
> it would be nice if the LV0104CS_HWGAIN_ #defines could be used here, 
> aren't the values 0x00 .. 0x18 just LV0104CS_HWGAIN_xx << 3?

Excellent idea, will do.
> 
> > +
> > +static const struct lv0104cs_mapping lv0104cs_int_times[] = {
> > +	{ 0, 12500, 0x00 },
> > +	{ 0, 100000, 0x02 },
> > +	{ 0, 200000, 0x04 },
> > +};
> 
> maybe something similar here for LV0104CS_INTEG

Excellent idea, will do.
> 
> > +
> > +static int lv0104cs_write_reg(struct lv0104cs_private *lv0104cs,
> > +				unsigned char regval)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = lv0104cs->client;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_master_send(client, &regval, 1);
> 
> maybe sizeof(regval) instead of 1

Agreed, will do.
> 
> > +	if (ret != 1) {
> > +		dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to write to device: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int lv0104cs_read_adc(struct lv0104cs_private *lv0104cs,
> > +				unsigned int *adc_output)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = lv0104cs->client;
> > +	unsigned char regval[2];
> 
> use 
> __be16 regval;

Sure thing, will do.
> 
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_master_recv(client, regval, 2);
> 
> sizeof(regval)

Agreed, will do.
> 
> > +	if (ret != 2) {
> > +		dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to read from device: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	*adc_output = (regval[0] << 8) + regval[1];
> 
> use be16_to_cpu()

Sure thing, will do.
> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int lv0104cs_get_lux(struct lv0104cs_private *lv0104cs,
> > +				unsigned int *val, unsigned int *val2)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned char regval = LV0104CS_REGVAL_MEASURE;
> > +	unsigned int adc_output;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	/* this function expects to be called while mutex is locked */
> > +	if (!mutex_is_locked(&lv0104cs->lock))
> > +		return -EACCES;
> > +
> > +	regval |= lv0104cs_hardwaregains[lv0104cs->hardwaregain].regval;
> > +	regval |= lv0104cs_int_times[lv0104cs->int_time].regval;
> > +	ret = lv0104cs_write_reg(lv0104cs, regval);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	/* wait for integration time to pass (with margin) */
> > +	switch (lv0104cs->int_time) {
> > +	case LV0104CS_INTEG_12m5:
> > +		msleep(50);
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case LV0104CS_INTEG_100m:
> > +		msleep(150);
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case LV0104CS_INTEG_200m:
> > +		msleep(250);
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	default:
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = lv0104cs_read_adc(lv0104cs, &adc_output);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = lv0104cs_write_reg(lv0104cs, LV0104CS_REGVAL_SLEEP);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	/* normalize to lux based on applied gain */
> > +	switch (lv0104cs->hardwaregain) {
> > +	case LV0104CS_HWGAIN_0x25:
> > +		*val = adc_output * 4;
> > +		*val2 = 0;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case LV0104CS_HWGAIN_1x:
> > +		*val = adc_output;
> > +		*val2 = 0;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case LV0104CS_HWGAIN_2x:
> > +		*val = adc_output / 2;
> > +		*val2 = (adc_output % 2) * 500000;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case LV0104CS_HWGAIN_8x:
> > +		*val = adc_output / 8;
> > +		*val2 = (adc_output % 8) * 125000;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	default:
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int lv0104cs_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > +				struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > +				int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> > +{
> > +	struct lv0104cs_private *lv0104cs = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (chan->type != IIO_LIGHT)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&lv0104cs->lock);
> > +
> > +	switch (mask) {
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
> > +		ret = lv0104cs_get_lux(lv0104cs, val, val2);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto err_mutex;
> > +		ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE:
> > +		*val = lv0104cs_calibscales[lv0104cs->calibscale].val;
> > +		*val2 = lv0104cs_calibscales[lv0104cs->calibscale].val2;
> > +		ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN:
> > +		*val = lv0104cs_hardwaregains[lv0104cs->hardwaregain].val;
> > +		*val2 = lv0104cs_hardwaregains[lv0104cs->hardwaregain].val2;
> > +		ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME:
> > +		*val = lv0104cs_int_times[lv0104cs->int_time].val;
> > +		*val2 = lv0104cs_int_times[lv0104cs->int_time].val2;
> > +		ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	default:
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +err_mutex:
> > +	mutex_unlock(&lv0104cs->lock);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int lv0104cs_set_calibscale(struct lv0104cs_private *lv0104cs,
> > +				int val, int val2)
> > +{
> > +	int calibscale = val * 1000000 + val2;
> > +	int floor, ceil, mid;
> > +	int ret, i, index;
> > +
> > +	/* round to nearest quantized sensitivity */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lv0104cs_calibscales) - 1; i++) {
> > +		floor = lv0104cs_calibscales[i].val * 1000000
> > +				+ lv0104cs_calibscales[i].val2;
> > +		ceil = lv0104cs_calibscales[i + 1].val * 1000000
> > +				+ lv0104cs_calibscales[i + 1].val2;
> > +		mid = (floor + ceil) / 2;
> > +
> > +		/* round down */
> > +		if (calibscale >= floor && calibscale < mid) {
> > +			index = i;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/* round up */
> > +		if (calibscale >= mid && calibscale <= ceil) {
> > +			index = i + 1;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(lv0104cs_calibscales) - 1)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	/* set sensitivity */
> > +	ret = lv0104cs_write_reg(lv0104cs, lv0104cs_calibscales[index].regval);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&lv0104cs->lock);
> 
> shoudn't the lock region include the set sensitivity above?

Good catch, will do.
> 
> > +	lv0104cs->calibscale = index;
> > +	mutex_unlock(&lv0104cs->lock);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int lv0104cs_set_hardwaregain(struct lv0104cs_private *lv0104cs,
> > +				int val, int val2)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	/* hard matching */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lv0104cs_hardwaregains); i++) {
> > +		if (val != lv0104cs_hardwaregains[i].val)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (val2 == lv0104cs_hardwaregains[i].val2)
> > +			break;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(lv0104cs_hardwaregains))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&lv0104cs->lock);
> > +	lv0104cs->hardwaregain = i;
> > +	mutex_unlock(&lv0104cs->lock);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int lv0104cs_set_int_time(struct lv0104cs_private *lv0104cs,
> > +				int val, int val2)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	/* hard matching */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lv0104cs_int_times); i++) {
> > +		if (val != lv0104cs_int_times[i].val)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (val2 == lv0104cs_int_times[i].val2)
> > +			break;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(lv0104cs_int_times))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&lv0104cs->lock);
> > +	lv0104cs->int_time = i;
> > +	mutex_unlock(&lv0104cs->lock);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int lv0104cs_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > +				struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > +				int val, int val2, long mask)
> > +{
> > +	struct lv0104cs_private *lv0104cs = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (chan->type != IIO_LIGHT)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	switch (mask) {
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE:
> > +		ret = lv0104cs_set_calibscale(lv0104cs, val, val2);
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN:
> > +		ret = lv0104cs_set_hardwaregain(lv0104cs, val, val2);
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME:
> > +		ret = lv0104cs_set_int_time(lv0104cs, val, val2);
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	default:
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t lv0104cs_show_calibscale_avail(struct device *dev,
> > +				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	ssize_t len = 0;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lv0104cs_calibscales); i++) {
> > +		len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%d.%06d ",
> > +				lv0104cs_calibscales[i].val,
> > +				lv0104cs_calibscales[i].val2);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	buf[len - 1] = '\n';
> > +
> > +	return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t lv0104cs_show_hardwaregain_avail(struct device *dev,
> > +				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	ssize_t len = 0;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lv0104cs_hardwaregains); i++) {
> > +		len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%d.%06d ",
> > +				lv0104cs_hardwaregains[i].val,
> > +				lv0104cs_hardwaregains[i].val2);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	buf[len - 1] = '\n';
> > +
> > +	return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t lv0104cs_show_int_time_avail(struct device *dev,
> > +				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	ssize_t len = 0;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lv0104cs_int_times); i++) {
> > +		len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%d.%06d ",
> > +				lv0104cs_int_times[i].val,
> > +				lv0104cs_int_times[i].val2);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	buf[len - 1] = '\n';
> > +
> > +	return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(calibscale_available, 0444,
> > +				lv0104cs_show_calibscale_avail, NULL, 0);
> > +static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(hardwaregain_available, 0444,
> > +				lv0104cs_show_hardwaregain_avail, NULL, 0);
> > +static IIO_DEV_ATTR_INT_TIME_AVAIL(lv0104cs_show_int_time_avail);
> > +
> > +static struct attribute *lv0104cs_attributes[] = {
> > +	&iio_dev_attr_calibscale_available.dev_attr.attr,
> > +	&iio_dev_attr_hardwaregain_available.dev_attr.attr,
> > +	&iio_dev_attr_integration_time_available.dev_attr.attr,
> > +	NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct attribute_group lv0104cs_attribute_group = {
> > +	.attrs = lv0104cs_attributes,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct iio_info lv0104cs_info = {
> > +	.attrs = &lv0104cs_attribute_group,
> > +	.read_raw = &lv0104cs_read_raw,
> > +	.write_raw = &lv0104cs_write_raw,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct iio_chan_spec lv0104cs_channels[] = {
> > +	{
> > +		.type = IIO_LIGHT,
> > +		.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) |
> > +				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBSCALE) |
> > +				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN) |
> 
> I think this should be just _SCALE; this is not about calibration, but 
> just sets a gain factor

Agreed, will do.
> 
> I don't quite understand the need/difference between CALIBSCALE / 
> HARDWAREGAIN

This device exposes two separate controls: gain (presumably a PGA of
sorts in between the photodiode and the ADC) and sensitivity (a cubic
trim control). These are mapped to HARDWAREGAIN and CALIBSCALE (now
SCALE), respectively.
> 
> > +				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME),
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int lv0104cs_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > +				const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > +{
> > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > +	struct lv0104cs_private *lv0104cs;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(struct lv0104cs_private));
> > +	if (!indio_dev)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	lv0104cs = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +
> > +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, lv0104cs);
> > +	lv0104cs->client = client;
> > +
> > +	mutex_init(&lv0104cs->lock);
> > +
> > +	lv0104cs->hardwaregain = LV0104CS_HWGAIN_1x;
> > +	lv0104cs->int_time = LV0104CS_INTEG_200m;
> > +	lv0104cs->calibscale = LV0104CS_CALIB_UNITY;
> > +
> > +	ret = lv0104cs_write_reg(lv0104cs,
> > +			lv0104cs_calibscales[LV0104CS_CALIB_UNITY].regval);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> > +	indio_dev->dev.parent = dev;
> > +	indio_dev->channels = lv0104cs_channels;
> > +	indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(lv0104cs_channels);
> > +	indio_dev->name = client->name;
> > +	indio_dev->info = &lv0104cs_info;
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_iio_device_register(dev, indio_dev);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to register device: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	dev_info(dev, "Successfully registered device\n");
> 
> please drop this output, considered just clutter

Sure thing, will do.
> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct i2c_device_id lv0104cs_id[] = {
> > +	{ "lv0104cs", 0 },
> > +	{ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, lv0104cs_id);
> > +
> > +static struct i2c_driver lv0104cs_i2c_driver = {
> > +	.driver = {
> > +		.name	= "lv0104cs",
> > +	},
> > +
> > +	.id_table	= lv0104cs_id,
> > +	.probe		= lv0104cs_probe,
> > +};
> > +module_i2c_driver(lv0104cs_i2c_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("LV0104CS Ambient Light Sensor Driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Peter Meerwald-Stadler
> Mobile: +43 664 24 44 418
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-15  4:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-14 14:58 [PATCH] iio: light: lv0104cs: Add support for LV0104CS light sensor Jeff LaBundy
2018-02-14 15:58 ` Peter Meerwald-Stadler
2018-02-15  4:46   ` Jeff LaBundy [this message]
2018-02-17 17:13     ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-17 19:18       ` Jeff LaBundy
2018-02-18 18:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeff LaBundy
2018-02-24 12:02   ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-02-25  2:38     ` Jeff LaBundy
2018-03-03 14:57       ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180215044642.GA18079@labundy.com \
    --to=jeff@labundy.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.