From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Sam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] spapr: drop DIV_ROUND_UP() from xics_max_server_number()
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:54:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180215165418.GA24818@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180215170831.39645199@bahia.lan>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:08:57PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:08:18 +1100
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 08:41:03PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > >
> > > It breaks migration of pre-2.7 machine types with unusual CPU topologies,
> > > but I guess this is an acceptable trade-off.
> >
> > No, not really. Weird topologies are still allowed on old machine
> > types for backwards compatibility, and we shouldn't break that. I
> > like the idea of consolidating this calculation, but we can't do it by
> > just breaking the older machines (at least not until they're formally
> > deprecated).
> >
>
> Heh, I had put this patch at the end because I was expecting you might
> nack it :)
>
> Per curiosity, when/how do we decide that an older machine type may be
> formally deprecated ?
For versioned machine types we decided that we'd keep them around upstream
for as long as they were needed by a downstream vendor, *provided* that
downstream vendor is contributing to QEMU in order to mitigate the maint
burden it would entail.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-15 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-14 19:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] spapr: fix VCPU ids miscalculation Greg Kurz
2018-02-14 19:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] spapr: use spapr->vsmt to compute VCPU ids Greg Kurz
2018-02-15 3:42 ` David Gibson
2018-02-14 19:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] spapr: move VCPU calculation to core machine code Greg Kurz
2018-02-14 19:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] spapr: rename spapr_vcpu_id() to spapr_get_vcpu_id() Greg Kurz
2018-02-15 3:50 ` David Gibson
2018-02-14 19:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] spapr: consolidate the VCPU id numbering logic in a single place Greg Kurz
2018-02-15 4:05 ` David Gibson
2018-02-14 19:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] spapr: drop DIV_ROUND_UP() from xics_max_server_number() Greg Kurz
2018-02-15 4:08 ` David Gibson
2018-02-15 16:08 ` Greg Kurz
2018-02-15 16:54 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2018-02-15 17:09 ` Greg Kurz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180215165418.GA24818@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.