From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG] lock_parent() breakage when used from shrink_dentry_list() (was Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] fs/dcache: Avoid remaining try_lock loop in shrink_dentry_list())
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 00:22:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180224002248.GH30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyP9JtyzUzA_S2sdKCK+8CZtNoA3UkXg5X4J0Hf2_ekjg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 01:35:52PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This is too subtle, and your fix to check d_lockref.count < 0 sounds
> wrong to me. If it's really gone, maybe it has been reused and the
> refcount is positive again, but it's something else than a dentry
> entirely?
>
> Hmm.
>
> No, you extended the rcu read section, so I guess your patch is fine.
> And lock_parent already has that pattern, soiit's not new.
>
> Ok, I agree, looks like lock_parent should just re-check that thing
> that it already checked earler, but that now might be true again
> because of we dropped d_lock.
IMO that's the right thing for backports; whether we keep it after
the getting rid of trylock loops is a different question. Note that
the only case where we do not have __dentry_kill() prevention
guaranteed by the caller (either by holding a reference, or by
holding onto ->i_lock all along) is in shrink_dentry_list().
And there we have more than enough of other subtle crap.
Moreover, there we have a good reason to treat "it had been moved"
as "kick it off the shrink list and free if it's already dead",
which might simplify the things. Below is a stab at that:
/*
* ONLY for shrink_dentry_list() - it returns false if it finds
* dentry grabbed, moved or killed, which is fine there but not
* anywhere else. OTOH, nobody else needs to deal with dentries
* getting killed under them.
*/
static bool shrink_lock_for_kill(struct dentry *dentry)
{
if (dentry->d_lockref.count)
return false;
inode = dentry->d_inode;
if (inode && unlikely(!spin_trylock(&inode->i_lock))) {
rcu_read_lock(); /* to protect inode */
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (unlikely(dentry->d_lockref.count))
goto out;
/* changed inode means that somebody had grabbed it */
if (unlikely(inode != dentry->d_inode))
goto out;
rcu_read_unlock();
}
parent = dentry->d_parent;
if (IS_ROOT(dentry) || likely(spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)))
return true;
rcu_read_lock(); /* to protect parent */
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
parent = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_parent);
spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
if (unlikely(parent != dentry->d_parent)) {
spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
goto out;
}
spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
if (likely(!dentry->d_lockref.count)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return true;
}
spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
out:
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
return false;
}
static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
{
struct dentry *dentry, *parent;
while (!list_empty(list)) {
struct inode *inode;
dentry = list_entry(list->prev, struct dentry, d_lru);
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (!shrink_lock_for_kill(dentry)) {
bool can_free = false;
d_shrink_del(dentry);
if (dentry->d_lockref.count < 0)
can_free = dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_MAY_FREE;
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
if (can_free)
dentry_free(dentry);
continue;
}
d_shrink_del(dentry);
parent = dentry->d_parent;
__dentry_kill(dentry);
if (dentry == parent)
continue;
dentry = parent;
....
same as now
....
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-24 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-22 23:50 [PATCH v2 0/6] fs/dcache: avoid trylock loops John Ogness
2018-02-22 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] fs/dcache: Remove stale comment from dentry_kill() John Ogness
2018-02-22 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] fs/dcache: Move dentry_kill() below lock_parent() John Ogness
2018-02-22 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] fs/dcache: Avoid the try_lock loop in d_delete() John Ogness
2018-02-23 2:08 ` Al Viro
2018-02-22 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] fs/dcache: Avoid the try_lock loops in dentry_kill() John Ogness
2018-02-23 2:22 ` Al Viro
2018-02-23 3:12 ` Al Viro
2018-02-23 3:16 ` Al Viro
2018-02-23 5:46 ` Al Viro
2018-02-22 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] fs/dcache: Avoid a try_lock loop in shrink_dentry_list() John Ogness
2018-02-23 3:48 ` Al Viro
2018-02-22 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] fs/dcache: Avoid remaining " John Ogness
2018-02-23 3:58 ` Al Viro
2018-02-23 4:08 ` Al Viro
2018-02-23 13:57 ` John Ogness
2018-02-23 15:09 ` Al Viro
2018-02-23 17:42 ` Al Viro
2018-02-23 20:13 ` [BUG] lock_parent() breakage when used from shrink_dentry_list() (was Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] fs/dcache: Avoid remaining try_lock loop in shrink_dentry_list()) Al Viro
2018-02-23 21:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-24 0:22 ` Al Viro [this message]
2018-02-25 7:40 ` Al Viro
2018-02-27 5:16 ` dcache: remove trylock loops (was Re: [BUG] lock_parent() breakage when used from shrink_dentry_list()) John Ogness
2018-03-12 19:13 ` Al Viro
2018-03-12 20:05 ` Al Viro
2018-03-12 20:33 ` Al Viro
2018-03-13 1:12 ` NeilBrown
2018-04-28 0:10 ` Al Viro
2018-03-12 20:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-12 20:39 ` Al Viro
2018-03-12 23:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-12 23:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-13 0:37 ` Al Viro
2018-03-13 0:50 ` Al Viro
2018-03-13 4:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-14 23:20 ` [PATCH] fs: Teach path_connected to handle nfs filesystems with multiple roots Eric W. Biederman
2018-03-15 22:34 ` Al Viro
2018-03-13 0:36 ` dcache: remove trylock loops (was Re: [BUG] lock_parent() breakage when used from shrink_dentry_list()) Al Viro
2018-03-12 22:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-03-13 20:46 ` John Ogness
2018-03-13 21:05 ` John Ogness
2018-03-13 23:59 ` Al Viro
2018-03-14 2:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-14 8:18 ` John Ogness
2018-03-02 9:04 ` [BUG] lock_parent() breakage when used from shrink_dentry_list() (was Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] fs/dcache: Avoid remaining try_lock loop in shrink_dentry_list()) Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-02-23 0:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] fs/dcache: avoid trylock loops Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180224002248.GH30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.