From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:33182 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751738AbeBYWiP (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:38:15 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1PMYpI6092176 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:38:15 -0500 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2gbu36x98v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:38:15 -0500 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:38:13 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 14:38:39 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Paul's grammar for Communcation Miss Definition in glossary.tex Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20180225041324.11085-1-xerofoify@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180225041324.11085-1-xerofoify@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20180225223839.GG2855@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nicholas Krause Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:13:24PM -0500, Nicholas Krause wrote: > This fixes Paul's or whoever wrote the glossary.tex file to > use proper grammar on line 21 by changing the some to some > other CPU to avoid a grammar mistake. > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause Good eyes! Pulled with a rework of the commit log. Thanx, Paul > --- > glossary.tex | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/glossary.tex b/glossary.tex > index 1b9db25..9bd4024 100644 > --- a/glossary.tex > +++ b/glossary.tex > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ > by increasing ``lock contention''). > Contrast with ``data locking''. > \item[Communication Miss:] > - A cache miss incurred because the some other CPU has written to > + A cache miss incurred because some other CPU has written to > the cache line since the last time this CPU accessed it. > \item[Critical Section:] > A section of code guarded by some synchronization mechanism, > -- > 2.14.1 >