From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752474AbeBZKUf (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 05:20:35 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:46630 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752045AbeBZKUe (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 05:20:34 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,396,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="23177042" Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:20:29 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Jeremy McNicoll Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Noever , Michael Jamet , Yehezkel Bernat , Bjorn Helgaas , Mario.Limonciello@dell.com, Radion Mirchevsky Subject: Re: [07/18] thunderbolt: Handle rejected Thunderbolt devices Message-ID: <20180226102029.GG27191@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20180213170018.9780-8-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20180222231736.GA628@mini-rhel.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180222231736.GA628@mini-rhel.redhat.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:17:38PM -0800, Jeremy McNicoll wrote: > > + if (pkg->link_info & ICM_LINK_INFO_REJECTED) { > > + tb_info(tb, "switch at %u.%u was rejected by ICM firmware\n", > > + link, depth); > > This kind of condition sounds more like an error instead of info. > Please bump this up to tb_WARN/tb_warn ideally tb_err(). No, this is not an error. > BTW - why do we have tb_WARN and tb_warn in drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h ? _WARN dumps out backtrace as well.