From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:30:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180226113000.GC4377@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+Cxw2-8Cf+6cg_yZC+SD66uNA5RO+ZaoHHmkpHLzjCih=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:25:28PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Both are the same values set by kvm userspace.
This still doesn't answer my question what "the non-sensical value which
is written by the guest will not reflect to guest-visible microcode
revision" means?
> This is correct. The link explains why the userspace sets microcode
> revision is still needed.
Why is it still needed?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-26 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 7:23 [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 9:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 10:06 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 10:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 11:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 11:25 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:30 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-02-26 11:37 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 11:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 12:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 12:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 13:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 14:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-26 14:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 19:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-26 20:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-26 21:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-27 8:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-08 9:24 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/spectre_v2: Don't check microcode versions when running under hypervisors tip-bot for Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-17 10:40 ` [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version Wanpeng Li
2018-04-17 20:24 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-18 3:24 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-04-18 9:03 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-18 10:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-23 12:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-23 13:08 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-23 13:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-04-23 16:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-24 2:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-04-24 3:14 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-24 5:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-24 13:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-04-24 2:56 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-02-26 11:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-26 12:20 ` Borislav Petkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-26 9:26 Liran Alon
2018-02-26 10:08 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180226113000.GC4377@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.