All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>,
	Nathan D Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Check for power state control capability.
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:55:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227175556.GA12219@nc-new> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180227032723.15474-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:27:23PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> eDP spec says - "If PSR/PSR2 is supported, the SET_POWER_CAPABLE bit in the
> EDP_GENERAL_CAPABILITY_1 register (DPCD Address 00701h, bit d7) must be set
> to 1."
> 
> Reject PSR on panels without this cap bit set as such panels cannot be
> controlled via SET_POWER & SET_DP_PWR_VOLTAGE register and the DP source
> needs to be able to do that for PSR.
> 
> Thanks to Nathan for debugging this.
> 
> Panel cap checks like this can be done just once, let's fix this
> when PSR dpcd init movement lands.
> 
> Cc: Nathan D Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
 Tested-by: Nathan Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 89f41d28c44a..e0701b7f87f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -405,6 +405,11 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!(intel_dp->edp_dpcd[1] & DP_EDP_SET_POWER_CAP)) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: panel lacks power state control\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * FIXME psr2_support is messed up. It's both computed
>  	 * dynamically during PSR enable, and extracted from sink
> -- 
> 2.14.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-27 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-27  3:27 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Check for power state control capability Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-02-27  4:14 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-02-27  5:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-02-27 17:55 ` Nathan Ciobanu [this message]
2018-02-27 20:26   ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180227175556.GA12219@nc-new \
    --to=nathan.d.ciobanu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.