From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: xuejiufei <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Caspar Zhang <caspar@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: fix race between blkcg_bio_issue_check and cgroup_rmdir
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:33:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227183355.GG24003@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac3f48fc-e306-5df3-1c30-cd3b385d971f@linux.alibaba.com>
Hello, Joseph.
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 09:45:49AM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> > IIRC, as long as the blkcg and the device are there, the blkgs aren't
> > gonna be destroyed. So, if you have a ref to the blkcg through
> > tryget, the blkg shouldn't go away.
> >
>
> Maybe we have misunderstanding here.
>
> In this case, blkg doesn't go away as we have rcu protect, but
> blkg_destroy() can be called, in which blkg_put() will put the last
> refcnt and then schedule __blkg_release_rcu().
>
> css refcnt can't prevent blkcg css from offlining, instead it is css
> online_cnt.
>
> css_tryget() will only get a refcnt of blkcg css, but can't be
> guaranteed to fail when css is confirmed to kill.
Ah, you're right. I was thinking we only destroy blkgs from blkcg
release path. Given that we primarily use blkcg refcnting to pin
them, I believe that's what we should do - ie. only call
pd_offline_fn() from blkcg_css_offline() path and do the rest of
destruction from blkcg_css_free(). What do you think?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 8:40 [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: fix race between blkcg_bio_issue_check and cgroup_rmdir Joseph Qi
[not found] ` <6f136c90-faa9-4bc0-b02f-3a112b4d8360-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-07 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-07 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20180207213811.GF695913-4dN5La/x3IkLX0oZNxdnEQ2O0Ztt9esIQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-08 2:29 ` Joseph Qi
2018-02-08 2:29 ` Joseph Qi
[not found] ` <b590caed-1423-4776-966d-cd9e346a8ea1-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-08 15:23 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-08 15:23 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-09 2:15 ` Joseph Qi
[not found] ` <aac95b90-786d-95bf-b93d-87ecca79f846-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-12 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-12 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-22 6:14 ` Joseph Qi
2018-02-22 15:18 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-23 1:56 ` xuejiufei
2018-02-23 14:23 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-24 1:45 ` Joseph Qi
2018-02-27 3:18 ` Joseph Qi
2018-02-27 18:33 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-02-28 6:52 ` Joseph Qi
2018-03-04 20:23 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-05 1:17 ` Joseph Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227183355.GG24003@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=caspar@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.