All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	LKMM Maintainers -- Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>,
	Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
	Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2 RFC] tools/memory-model: redefine rb in terms of rcu-fence
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 20:50:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180302045015.GO3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180302043141.fgmjyysrws55pi7q@tardis>

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 12:31:41PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:37:58AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:49:06AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

[ . . . ]

> > And as Andrea pointed out off-list, I did indeed mess up Boqun's change.
> > I forgot to change the "irreflexive" into "acyclic".  Applying that change
> > makes everything work.
> > 
> > Please accept my apologies for my confusion!
> > 
> 
> np, also I should have provided a proper patch for your testing.
> 
> For this Alan's patch, feel free to add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

Alan's last submission was still RFC, so I have not yet queued it.
So this ball is still in Alan's court.

							Thanx, Paul

> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > > > > I prefer this because we already treat "gp" as "strong-fence", which
> > > > > already is a "rcu-link".
> > > > 
> > > > That's a good point; it had not occurred to me.
> > > 
> > > And if I remove the "gp" but leave the last line, it does properly
> > > classify the two new litmus tests.
> > > 
> > > 							Thanx, Paul
> > > 
> > > > >  Also, recurisively extending rcu-fence with
> > > > > itself is exactly calculating the transitive closure, which we can avoid
> > > > > by using a "acycle" rule. Besides, it looks more consistent with hb and
> > > > > pb.
> > > > 
> > > > That _had_ occurred to me.  But I couldn't see any way to do it while 
> > > > still defining rcu-fence correctly.
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
> > > index 1e5c4653dd12..75d3c225146c 100644
> > > --- a/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
> > > +++ b/tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.cat
> > > @@ -106,12 +106,11 @@ let rcu-link = hb* ; pb* ; prop
> > >   * Any sequence containing at least as many grace periods as RCU read-side
> > >   * critical sections (joined by rcu-link) acts as a generalized strong fence.
> > >   *)
> > > -let rec rcu-fence = gp |
> > > +let rec rcu-fence =
> > >  	(gp ; rcu-link ; rscs) |
> > >  	(rscs ; rcu-link ; gp) |
> > >  	(gp ; rcu-link ; rcu-fence ; rcu-link ; rscs) |
> > > -	(rscs ; rcu-link ; rcu-fence ; rcu-link ; gp) |
> > > -	(rcu-fence ; rcu-link ; rcu-fence)
> > > +	(rscs ; rcu-link ; rcu-fence ; rcu-link ; gp)
> > >  
> > >  (* rb orders instructions just as pb does *)
> > >  let rb = prop ; rcu-fence ; hb* ; pb*
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-02  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-28 20:13 [PATCH 2/2 v2 RFC] tools/memory-model: redefine rb in terms of rcu-fence Alan Stern
2018-03-01  1:55 ` Boqun Feng
2018-03-01  4:49   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-01  8:39     ` Boqun Feng
2018-03-01 14:28       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-01 15:49   ` Alan Stern
2018-03-01 17:49     ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-01 18:37       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-02  4:31         ` Boqun Feng
2018-03-02  4:50           ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-03-02 15:17             ` Alan Stern
2018-03-02 17:38               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-13 13:56 ` Andrea Parri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180302045015.GO3777@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.