All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Wei Wang" <weiwan@google.com>,
	"Hideaki YOSHIFUJI" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	"Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: Reflect MTU changes on PMTU of exceptions for MTU-less routes
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 00:12:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180305001245.23b56b3f@epycfail> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180303122236.6dde3a9b@epycfail>

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 12:22:36 +0100
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> wrote:

> > And please codify the above expectation as a test under
> > tools/testing/selftests/net  
> 
> And this, along with v2.

On a second thought: I start thinking it doesn't make much sense,
especially given the current context of self-tests, to explicitly test
this, because it's a rather particular corner case.

I think it would make more sense to introduce generic tests first.
About, say, PMTU, or route exceptions, but not "tunnel causes route
exception and administrative change doesn't affect PMTU".

-- 
Stefano

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-04 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-05 22:47 [PATCH net v2] ipv6: Reflect MTU changes on PMTU of exceptions for MTU-less routes Stefano Brivio
2018-03-02 18:54 ` [PATCH net] " Maciej Żenczykowski
2018-03-03 11:21   ` Stefano Brivio
2018-03-02 22:39 ` David Ahern
2018-03-03 11:22   ` Stefano Brivio
2018-03-04 23:12     ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2018-03-05  1:11       ` David Ahern
2018-03-05 12:29         ` Stefano Brivio
2018-03-05 14:14           ` David Miller
2018-03-05 15:27           ` David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180305001245.23b56b3f@epycfail \
    --to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=weiwan@google.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.