All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20180305111107.GH25377@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index cbed632..d580a9b 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -8,16 +8,16 @@ On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:10:17PM -0800, J Freyensee wrote:
 > > +	tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
 > >   	if (rc <  0)
 > Why is this if() check not directly after the tpm_transmit_cmd() call that
-> sets rc?  Is it correct you want to destroy buf regardless of the
+> sets rc?  Is it correct you want to destroy buf regardless of the
 > tpm_transmit_cmd() outcome?
 > >   		return rc;
 > > -
-> > -	if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
+> > -	if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
 > > +	out = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;
 > 
 > So buf has been destroyed, buf.data sill has something valid to assign to
 > out?
-> > +	if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
+> > +	if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
 > >   		chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
 > >   	return 0;
 > Thanks,
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 78d87a2..4596ec9 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  "ref\05d8921fb-f7e0-5498-99e2-d4d84aa597f3@gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 3/5] tpm: migrate tpm2_probe() to use struct tpm_buf\0"
- "Date\0Mon, 05 Mar 2018 11:11:07 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:11:07 +0200\0"
  "To\0J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@gmail.com>\0"
  "Cc\0linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
   linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
@@ -25,16 +25,16 @@
  "> > +\ttpm_buf_destroy(&buf);\n"
  "> >   \tif (rc <  0)\n"
  "> Why is this if() check not directly after the tpm_transmit_cmd() call that\n"
- "> sets rc?\302\240 Is it correct you want to destroy buf regardless of the\n"
+ "> sets rc?  Is it correct you want to destroy buf regardless of the\n"
  "> tpm_transmit_cmd() outcome?\n"
  "> >   \t\treturn rc;\n"
  "> > -\n"
- "> > -\tif (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
+ "> > -\tif (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
  "> > +\tout = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;\n"
  "> \n"
  "> So buf has been destroyed, buf.data sill has something valid to assign to\n"
  "> out?\n"
- "> > +\tif (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
+ "> > +\tif (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
  "> >   \t\tchip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;\n"
  "> >   \treturn 0;\n"
  "> Thanks,\n"
@@ -46,4 +46,4 @@
  "\n"
  /Jarkko
 
-f87d4d38cbc2963718455676ffdfb5139ece58da25e2718a77d26db88cf24875
+1ebb7dd508c98c32225c525de40d356b954d05cbd7a372c10f610a39648b5d8c

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index cbed632..2a34c24 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -8,16 +8,16 @@ On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:10:17PM -0800, J Freyensee wrote:
 > > +	tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
 > >   	if (rc <  0)
 > Why is this if() check not directly after the tpm_transmit_cmd() call that
-> sets rc?  Is it correct you want to destroy buf regardless of the
+> sets rc?? Is it correct you want to destroy buf regardless of the
 > tpm_transmit_cmd() outcome?
 > >   		return rc;
 > > -
-> > -	if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
+> > -	if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
 > > +	out = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;
 > 
 > So buf has been destroyed, buf.data sill has something valid to assign to
 > out?
-> > +	if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
+> > +	if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
 > >   		chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
 > >   	return 0;
 > Thanks,
@@ -28,3 +28,7 @@ can be called if the response data is not needed other than everything
 went OK (tpm_transmit_cmd() already digs this info).
 
 /Jarkko
+--
+To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
+the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
+More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 78d87a2..32dc761 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -1,18 +1,10 @@
  "ref\020180228195819.22231-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com\0"
  "ref\020180228195819.22231-4-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com\0"
  "ref\05d8921fb-f7e0-5498-99e2-d4d84aa597f3@gmail.com\0"
- "From\0Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 3/5] tpm: migrate tpm2_probe() to use struct tpm_buf\0"
- "Date\0Mon, 05 Mar 2018 11:11:07 +0000\0"
- "To\0J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@gmail.com>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
-  linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
-  keyrings@vger.kernel.org
-  Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
-  Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
-  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-  Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
- " open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0"
+ "From\0jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Sakkinen)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH 3/5] tpm: migrate tpm2_probe() to use struct tpm_buf\0"
+ "Date\0Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:11:07 +0200\0"
+ "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:10:17PM -0800, J Freyensee wrote:\n"
@@ -25,16 +17,16 @@
  "> > +\ttpm_buf_destroy(&buf);\n"
  "> >   \tif (rc <  0)\n"
  "> Why is this if() check not directly after the tpm_transmit_cmd() call that\n"
- "> sets rc?\302\240 Is it correct you want to destroy buf regardless of the\n"
+ "> sets rc?? Is it correct you want to destroy buf regardless of the\n"
  "> tpm_transmit_cmd() outcome?\n"
  "> >   \t\treturn rc;\n"
  "> > -\n"
- "> > -\tif (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
+ "> > -\tif (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
  "> > +\tout = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;\n"
  "> \n"
  "> So buf has been destroyed, buf.data sill has something valid to assign to\n"
  "> out?\n"
- "> > +\tif (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
+ "> > +\tif (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
  "> >   \t\tchip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;\n"
  "> >   \treturn 0;\n"
  "> Thanks,\n"
@@ -44,6 +36,10 @@
  "can be called if the response data is not needed other than everything\n"
  "went OK (tpm_transmit_cmd() already digs this info).\n"
  "\n"
- /Jarkko
+ "/Jarkko\n"
+ "--\n"
+ "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n"
+ "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
+ More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
-f87d4d38cbc2963718455676ffdfb5139ece58da25e2718a77d26db88cf24875
+f35912b19d04171fed52c7281abcc00644671fa19227838bbb2209394a038438

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index cbed632..66ada79 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -12,12 +12,12 @@ On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:10:17PM -0800, J Freyensee wrote:
 > tpm_transmit_cmd() outcome?
 > >   		return rc;
 > > -
-> > -	if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
+> > -	if (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
 > > +	out = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;
 > 
 > So buf has been destroyed, buf.data sill has something valid to assign to
 > out?
-> > +	if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
+> > +	if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
 > >   		chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
 > >   	return 0;
 > Thanks,
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index 78d87a2..c75f401 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  "ref\05d8921fb-f7e0-5498-99e2-d4d84aa597f3@gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 3/5] tpm: migrate tpm2_probe() to use struct tpm_buf\0"
- "Date\0Mon, 05 Mar 2018 11:11:07 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:11:07 +0200\0"
  "To\0J Freyensee <why2jjj.linux@gmail.com>\0"
  "Cc\0linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
   linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
@@ -29,12 +29,12 @@
  "> tpm_transmit_cmd() outcome?\n"
  "> >   \t\treturn rc;\n"
  "> > -\n"
- "> > -\tif (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
+ "> > -\tif (be16_to_cpu(cmd.header.out.tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
  "> > +\tout = (struct tpm_output_header *)buf.data;\n"
  "> \n"
  "> So buf has been destroyed, buf.data sill has something valid to assign to\n"
  "> out?\n"
- "> > +\tif (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) = TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
+ "> > +\tif (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)\n"
  "> >   \t\tchip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;\n"
  "> >   \treturn 0;\n"
  "> Thanks,\n"
@@ -46,4 +46,4 @@
  "\n"
  /Jarkko
 
-f87d4d38cbc2963718455676ffdfb5139ece58da25e2718a77d26db88cf24875
+eaafd761f2b9005118ea5bff9525d51b571fffd73fddf4825e746733a841e8a0

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.