From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: John Hurley <john.hurley@netronome.com>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@gmail.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/6] offload linux bonding tc ingress rules
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:16:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180305161613.2a692833@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK+XE=nSQQ5NY2iY9CnFDmb8FLRsR81AR0+tqGScO0Nngo=w7g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 23:57:18 +0000, John Hurley wrote:
> > what is your approach for rules whose bond is their egress device
> > (ingress = vf port
> > representor)?
>
> Egress offload will be handled entirely by the NFP driver.
> Basically, notifiers will track the slaves/masters and update the card
> with any groups that consist entirely of reprs.
> We then offload the TC rule outputting to the given group - because it
> is an ingress match we can access the egress netdev in the block
> callback.
And you handle egdev call too? Or are we hoping to get rid of that
before? :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-06 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-05 13:28 [RFC net-next 0/6] offload linux bonding tc ingress rules John Hurley
2018-03-05 13:28 ` [RFC net-next 1/6] drivers: net: bonding: add tc offload infastructure to bond John Hurley
2018-03-05 13:28 ` [RFC net-next 2/6] driver: net: bonding: allow registration of tc offload callbacks in bond John Hurley
2018-03-07 10:57 ` Jiri Pirko
2018-03-05 13:28 ` [RFC net-next 3/6] drivers: net: bonding: restrict bond mods when rules are offloaded John Hurley
2018-03-05 13:28 ` [RFC net-next 4/6] nfp: add ndo_set_mac_address for representors John Hurley
2018-03-05 21:39 ` Or Gerlitz
2018-03-05 23:20 ` John Hurley
2018-03-05 13:28 ` [RFC net-next 5/6] nfp: register repr ports for bond offloads John Hurley
2018-03-05 13:28 ` [RFC net-next 6/6] nfp: support offloading multiple rules with same cookie John Hurley
2018-03-05 21:43 ` [RFC net-next 0/6] offload linux bonding tc ingress rules Or Gerlitz
2018-03-05 23:57 ` John Hurley
2018-03-06 0:16 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2018-03-05 22:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2018-03-06 2:34 ` Roopa Prabhu
2018-03-06 7:49 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180305161613.2a692833@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=gerlitz.or@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=john.hurley@netronome.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.