From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix transaction allocation deadlock in IO path
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 08:32:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180305213248.GC18129@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180305174455.GB14201@wotan.suse.de>
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:44:55PM +0000, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 03:11:20PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> >
> > xfs_trans_alloc() does GFP_KERNEL allocation, and we can call it
> > while holding pages locked for writeback in the ->writepages path.
> > The memory allocation is allowed to wait on pages under writeback,
> > and so can wait on pages that are held locked in writeback by the
> > caller.
> >
> > This affects both pre-IO submission and post-IO submission paths.
> > Hence xfs_setsize_trans_alloc(), xfs_reflink_end_cow(),
> > xfs_iomap_write_unwritten() and xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range().
> > xfs_iomap_write_unwritten() already does the right thing, but the
> > others don't. Fix them.
> >
> > Signed-Off-By: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> I believe these are two separate regressions though, introduced on separate
> kernels Can we treat them as such and use respective Fixes tag for them?
Neither are regressions - they are effectively zero-day bugs. In
general, I don't use Fixes tags for things that are not regressions
and are easily discoverable from the published git history...
>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 3 ++-
> > fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > index 9c6a830da0ee..a0afb6411417 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> > @@ -209,7 +209,8 @@ xfs_setfilesize_trans_alloc(
> > struct xfs_trans *tp;
> > int error;
> >
> > - error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_fsyncts, 0, 0, 0, &tp);
> > + error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_fsyncts, 0, 0,
> > + XFS_TRANS_NOFS, &tp);
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> >
>
> Fixes: 253f4911f297b ("xfs: better xfs_trans_alloc interface")
No, thats wrong - that commit didn't change any behaviour. The
original commit:
281627df3eb5 ("xfs: log file size updates at I/O completion time")
called:
tp = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, XFS_TRANS_FSYNC_TS);
which resulted in a GFP_KERNEL allocation via:
tp = _xfs_trans_alloc(mp, type, KM_SLEEP);
So this is a zero-day bug in logging file size updates at IO
completion.
> Introduced on v4.7
>
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > index 270246943a06..8c16177b33d4 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> > @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range(
> >
> > /* Start a rolling transaction to remove the mappings */
> > error = xfs_trans_alloc(ip->i_mount, &M_RES(ip->i_mount)->tr_write,
> > - 0, 0, 0, &tp);
> > + 0, 0, XFS_TRANS_NOFS, &tp);
> > if (error)
> > goto out;
> >
> > @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ xfs_reflink_end_cow(
> > (unsigned int)(end_fsb - offset_fsb),
> > XFS_DATA_FORK);
> > error = xfs_trans_alloc(ip->i_mount, &M_RES(ip->i_mount)->tr_write,
> > - resblks, 0, XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);
> > + resblks, 0, XFS_TRANS_RESERVE | XFS_TRANS_NOFS, &tp);
> > if (error)
> > goto out;
>
> For both of the above:
>
> Fixes: 43caeb187deb9 ("xfs: move mappings from cow fork to data fork after copy-write)"
And that's a zero-day, too. So neither are regressions.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-05 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-05 4:11 [PATCH] xfs: fix transaction allocation deadlock in IO path Dave Chinner
2018-03-05 14:40 ` Brian Foster
2018-03-05 21:38 ` Dave Chinner
2018-03-05 17:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2018-03-05 21:32 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2018-03-06 16:53 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-07 15:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2018-03-08 8:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180305213248.GC18129@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.