All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v4 3/3] s390x/sclp: extend SCLP event masks to 64 bits
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:27:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180306102752.168548c7.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d16953b5-e47d-937e-dd61-f0acf302d949@de.ibm.com>

On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 09:23:23 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 03/05/2018 04:27 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:44:46 +0100
> > Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 02/23/2018 06:42 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:  
> >>> Extend the SCLP event masks to 64 bits.
> >>>
> >>> Notice that using any of the new bits results in a state that cannot be
> >>> migrated to an older version.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  hw/s390x/event-facility.c         | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >>>  include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h |  2 +-
> >>>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> >>> index e04ed9f..c3e39ee 100644
> >>> --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> >>> +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> >>> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct SCLPEventFacility {
> >>>      SysBusDevice parent_obj;
> >>>      SCLPEventsBus sbus;
> >>>      /* guest's receive mask */
> >>> -    sccb_mask_t receive_mask;
> >>> +    uint32_t receive_mask_pieces[2];    
> >>
> >>
> >> Before the change, we basically use be32_to_cpu to transfer the byte field into a cpu
> >> endianess value. In the end it is actually a bitfield, but for compat we need to keep
> >> he reversal. So it will be hard to get this fixed without some kind of ugliness.  
> > 
> > Could we also use a compat mask callback/handler for older machines and
> > switch to 64 bit handlers for the default case? Probably would be even
> > more ugly, though.  
> 
> Claudio had a version with a pre/post/load/save handler. Claudio can you repost this
> version so that we can have a look what is "less ugly"?
> 

Would that other version be independent of the first two patches (i.e.,
only replace this patch)?

I would like to apply patch 1 as it is a fix, and patch 2 seems
uncontroversial as a cleanup.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-06  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-23 17:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] s390x/sclp: 64 bit event masks Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-23 17:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] s390x/sclp: proper support of larger send and receive masks Claudio Imbrenda
2018-03-02  9:09   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-06 15:21     ` Cornelia Huck
2018-03-06 15:29       ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-23 17:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] s390x/sclp: clean up sclp masks Claudio Imbrenda
2018-03-02  9:18   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-06 15:27   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2018-02-23 17:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/3] s390x/sclp: extend SCLP event masks to 64 bits Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-26 16:57   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-28 19:31     ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-06 14:26     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-03-02  9:44   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-05 15:27     ` Cornelia Huck
2018-03-06  8:23       ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-06  9:27         ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-03-06 15:09           ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-03-06 15:09         ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-03-06 15:07       ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-26 16:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] s390x/sclp: 64 bit event masks Cornelia Huck
2018-03-07  9:41 ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180306102752.168548c7.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.