From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] sched/fair: update util_est only on util_avg updates
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:48:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180308094830.GK25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180222170153.673-5-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 05:01:53PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> +#define UTIL_EST_NEED_UPDATE_FLAG 0x1
> @@ -5321,12 +5345,19 @@ static inline void util_est_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> if (!task_sleep)
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * Skip update of task's estimated utilization if the PELT signal has
> + * never been updated (at least once) since last enqueue time.
> + */
> + ue = READ_ONCE(p->se.avg.util_est);
> + if (ue.enqueued & UTIL_EST_NEED_UPDATE_FLAG)
> + return;
The name and function seem inverted, if the flag is set, we do _NOT_
update util_est.
How about something like UTIL_EST_UNCHANGED ? That would give:
/*
* If the PELT values haven't changed since enqueue time,
* skip the util_est update.
*/
if (enqueue & UTIL_EST_UNCHANGED)
return;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-08 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-22 17:01 [PATCH v5 0/4] Utilization estimation (util_est) for FAIR tasks Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-22 17:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] sched/fair: add util_est on top of PELT Patrick Bellasi
2018-03-01 17:42 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-03-06 18:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-07 12:32 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-03-06 18:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-07 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-07 15:37 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-03-07 11:31 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-03-07 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-07 15:24 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-03-07 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-06 19:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-07 11:47 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-03-07 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-07 15:16 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-22 17:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] sched/fair: use util_est in LB and WU paths Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-22 17:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: use util_est for OPP selection Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-26 4:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-03-07 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-22 17:01 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] sched/fair: update util_est only on util_avg updates Patrick Bellasi
2018-03-01 17:46 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-03-07 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-08 9:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-08 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-03-08 10:37 ` Patrick Bellasi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180308094830.GK25201@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=smuckle@google.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.