From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ovl: Do not check for redirect if this is last layer
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 09:18:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180309141834.GB4596@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxgubChWBGWOk-V-0+2OZcUYYRnyrt8OELhY+gZKO3PnLA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:27:21AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> > If we are looking in last layer, then there should not be any need to
> > process redirect. redirect information is used only for lookup in next
> > lower layer and there is no more lower layer to look into. So no need
> > to process redirects.
> >
> > IOW, ignore redirects on lowest layer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
>
> > ---
> > fs/overlayfs/namei.c | 15 +++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/namei.c b/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
> > index 2e173cfbda0e..32d1d96f80b6 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
> > @@ -248,13 +248,16 @@ static int ovl_lookup_single(struct dentry *base, struct ovl_lookup_data *d,
> > goto out;
> > }
> > d->is_dir = true;
> > - if (!d->last && ovl_is_opaquedir(this)) {
> > - d->stop = d->opaque = true;
> > - goto out;
>
> I preferred to go with if (d->last) goto out; I like to avoid nesting
> when possible.
> but choose whichever you like.
I liked your version better as well. :-). Will do if (d->last) goto out;
Vivek
>
> > + if (!d->last) {
> > + if (ovl_is_opaquedir(this)) {
> > + d->stop = d->opaque = true;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = ovl_check_redirect(this, d, prelen, post);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto out_err;
> > }
> > - err = ovl_check_redirect(this, d, prelen, post);
> > - if (err)
> > - goto out_err;
> > out:
> > *ret = this;
> > return 0;
> > --
> > 2.13.6
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-09 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-08 22:18 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Misc ovl_lookup() related fixes Vivek Goyal
2018-03-08 22:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] ovl: Set d->last properly during lookup Vivek Goyal
2018-03-08 22:25 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-09 14:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2018-03-08 22:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] ovl: Do not check for redirect if this is last layer Vivek Goyal
2018-03-08 22:27 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-09 14:18 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2018-03-08 22:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] ovl: set d->is_dir and d->opaque for last path element Vivek Goyal
2018-03-08 22:34 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-09 14:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2018-03-09 15:20 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-09 16:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2018-03-09 16:38 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-03-09 16:44 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180309141834.GB4596@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.