From: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@apporbit.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: VLA commit log
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:26:39 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180312052639.GE8631@eros> (raw)
Hi,
I got some push back on the commit log we have all started to use
(copying Kees' initial commit log). If we are going to do hundreds of
these patches should we write a perfectly correct commit log that can be
included as the start of the 'why' of each VLA removal patch? Here is
my attempt, I am quite bad at writing commit logs so would love someone
to fix it up.
Kernel stack size is limited. Variable Length Arrays (VLA) open the
kernel up to stack abuse in a couple of ways;
1. If the variable can be controlled by an attacker.
2. Not having the size of the stack right there in plain site makes it
harder to maintain the code base because changes in one place can effect
the stack in another place (i.e in another function).
It would be nice to be able to build the kernel with -Wvla. There has
been some consensus on this already [1].
...
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
The '...' would of course be different for each patch. In case you
missed it here is the catalyst for this email
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 03:49:40PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> The kernel would like to have all stack VLA usage removed[1].
Can you please stop writing this? The Linux kernel isn't
sentient; it doesn't "like" anything. You need to explain why
*you* (and other people) believe these changes should be made.
Perhaps we should add a summary of all the gcc discussion i.e why const
variables still cause gcc to emit a VLA warning.
thanks,
Tobin.
next reply other threads:[~2018-03-12 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-12 5:26 Tobin C. Harding [this message]
2018-03-12 5:38 ` VLA commit log Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-03-12 5:44 ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-03-13 4:05 ` Kees Cook
2018-03-12 10:28 ` Salvatore Mesoraca
2018-03-13 4:53 ` Tycho Andersen
2018-03-13 5:46 ` Tobin C. Harding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180312052639.GE8631@eros \
--to=tobin@apporbit.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.