All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 199121] New: Packet header is incorrect when following through an IPsec tunnel after upgrade kernel to 4.15
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 07:59:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180315075951.2cee5ea0@xeon-e3> (raw)



Begin forwarded message:

Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 06:37:27 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: [Bug 199121] New: Packet header is incorrect when following through an IPsec tunnel after upgrade kernel to 4.15


https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199121

            Bug ID: 199121
           Summary: Packet header is incorrect when following through an
                    IPsec tunnel after upgrade kernel to 4.15
           Product: Networking
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 4.15.9
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: Other
          Assignee: stephen@networkplumber.org
          Reporter: posonsky@yandex.ru
        Regression: No

I have been using IPsec tunnel for a while. StrongSwan is used for management:
```
# swanctl -l
pfsense2: #1, ESTABLISHED, IKEv2, cc04d3c5b34b4bda_i* f150c78e4fc042ef_r
  local  '90.188.239.175' @ 90.188.239.175[500]
  remote '62.152.54.102' @ 62.152.54.102[500]
  3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048
  established 649s ago, reauth in 2746s
  pfsense2: #1, reqid 1, INSTALLED, TUNNEL, ESP:AES_CBC-256/HMAC_SHA1_96
    installed 649s ago, rekeying in 286s, expires in 551s
    in  c41e18d6,    588 bytes,     7 packets,   643s ago
    out cfad3c32,    588 bytes,     7 packets,   643s ago
    local  192.168.8.0/24
    remote 10.10.1.0/24
```
And everything worked fine. But after updating to 4.15 traffic stopped passing.

I created [issue](https://wiki.strongswan.org/issues/2571) on
wiki.strongswan.org. During the analysis of the situation it was found, when I
try to send ICMP request to 10.10.1.248, for example, 
```
$ ping 10.10.1.248
PING 10.10.1.248 (10.10.1.248) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 10.10.1.248 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 3068ms
```
the response is returned as if from 8.0.1.248.
```
# tcpdump -n -vv -i ppp0 icmp
dropped privs to tcpdump
tcpdump: listening on ppp0, link-type LINUX_SLL (Linux cooked), capture size
262144 bytes
01:42:37.767964 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 42527, offset 0, flags [none], proto
ICMP (1), length 84)
    10.10.1.248 > 192.168.8.1: ICMP echo reply, id 12345, seq 1, length 64
01:42:38.767950 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 42736, offset 0, flags [none], proto
ICMP (1), length 84)
    10.10.1.248 > 192.168.8.1: ICMP echo reply, id 12345, seq 2, length 64
01:42:39.771778 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 42807, offset 0, flags [none], proto
ICMP (1), length 84)
    10.10.1.248 > 192.168.8.1: ICMP echo reply, id 12345, seq 3, length 64
01:42:40.768358 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 42816, offset 0, flags [none], proto
ICMP (1), length 84)
    10.10.1.248 > 192.168.8.1: ICMP echo reply, id 12345, seq 4, length 64
```
I have tested on all versions of 4.15 since 4.15.1.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2018-03-15 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-15 14:59 Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2018-03-16  6:58 ` Fw: [Bug 199121] New: Packet header is incorrect when following through an IPsec tunnel after upgrade kernel to 4.15 Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180315075951.2cee5ea0@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.