From: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "jthumshirn@suse.de" <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"martin@lichtvoll.de" <martin@lichtvoll.de>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"oleksandr@natalenko.name" <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
"hare@suse.com" <hare@suse.com>,
"jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change synchronize_rcu() in scsi_device_quiesce() into synchronize_sched()
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:29:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180319162921.GS2943022@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1521476333.2776.9.camel@wdc.com>
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 04:18:54PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The algorithm explained above does not depend on sched-rcu. But because
> percpu_ref_tryget_live() uses sched-rcu and because we need to add an RCU lock
> around that call we are forced to use sched-rcu. I hope this makes it clear.
This could be me being slow but can you explain how what
percpu_ref_tryget_live() uses internally affects whether we can use
regular RCU around it?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-19 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-16 17:35 [PATCH] Change synchronize_rcu() in scsi_device_quiesce() into synchronize_sched() Bart Van Assche
2018-03-16 21:42 ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-03-16 21:42 ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-03-16 21:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-19 9:02 ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-03-19 14:31 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-19 15:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-19 15:21 ` tj
2018-03-19 16:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-19 16:29 ` tj [this message]
2018-03-19 16:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-19 17:02 ` tj
2018-03-19 20:19 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-03-19 20:19 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180319162921.GS2943022@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.