From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] s390x/kvm: call cpu_synchronize_state() on every kvm_arch_handle_exit()
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:20:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180326092036.12780-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
Manually having to use cpu_synchronize_state() is error prone. I don't
think that the performance impact is that huge if we simply synchronize
the state on every kvm_arch_handle_exit() call. This makes the code
easier to maintain.
We now also call it (although not neded) for
- KVM_EXIT_S390_RESET -> s390_reipl_request()
- KVM_EXIT_DEBUG -> kvm_arch_handle_debug_exit()
- unmanagable/unimplemented intercepts
- ICPT_WAITPSW -> s390_handle_wait() -> cpu gets halted
- ICPT_CPU_STOP -> do_stop_interrupt() -> cpu gets halted
- Scenarios where we inject an operation exception
- handle_sigp() on the source CPU
- handle_stsi()
I don't think any of these are performance critical. Especially as we
have all information directly contained in kvm_run, there are no
additional IOCTLs to issue on modern kernels.
Remaining places (for s390x) are in
- target/s390x/sigp.c, on the target CPU
- target/s390x/cpu.c:s390_cpu_get_crash_info()
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 8 --------
target/s390x/kvm.c | 20 ++------------------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
index 3fcc330fe3..02a815fd31 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
@@ -155,8 +155,6 @@ int clp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra)
S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb();
int i;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
-
if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_PRIVILEGED, 4, ra);
return 0;
@@ -389,8 +387,6 @@ int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra)
uint32_t fh;
uint8_t pcias;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
-
if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_PRIVILEGED, 4, ra);
return 0;
@@ -487,8 +483,6 @@ int pcistg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra)
uint32_t fh;
uint8_t pcias;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
-
if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_PRIVILEGED, 4, ra);
return 0;
@@ -620,8 +614,6 @@ int rpcit_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra)
S390IOTLBEntry entry;
hwaddr start, end;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
-
if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_PRIVILEGED, 4, ra);
return 0;
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index f570896dc1..7de861ab34 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -1081,7 +1081,6 @@ static int kvm_sclp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run,
uint32_t code;
int r = 0;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
sccb = env->regs[ipbh0 & 0xf];
code = env->regs[(ipbh0 & 0xf0) >> 4];
@@ -1101,8 +1100,6 @@ static int handle_b2(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run, uint8_t ipa1)
int rc = 0;
uint16_t ipbh0 = (run->s390_sieic.ipb & 0xffff0000) >> 16;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
-
switch (ipa1) {
case PRIV_B2_XSCH:
ioinst_handle_xsch(cpu, env->regs[1], RA_IGNORED);
@@ -1248,7 +1245,6 @@ static int kvm_stpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
uint8_t ar;
if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
fiba = get_base_disp_rxy(cpu, run, &ar);
return stpcifc_service_call(cpu, r1, fiba, ar, RA_IGNORED);
@@ -1266,7 +1262,6 @@ static int kvm_sic_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
uint16_t mode;
int r;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
mode = env->regs[r1] & 0xffff;
isc = (env->regs[r3] >> 27) & 0x7;
r = css_do_sic(env, isc, mode);
@@ -1297,7 +1292,6 @@ static int kvm_pcistb_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
uint8_t ar;
if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
gaddr = get_base_disp_rsy(cpu, run, &ar);
return pcistb_service_call(cpu, r1, r3, gaddr, ar, RA_IGNORED);
@@ -1313,7 +1307,6 @@ static int kvm_mpcifc_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
uint8_t ar;
if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
fiba = get_base_disp_rxy(cpu, run, &ar);
return mpcifc_service_call(cpu, r1, fiba, ar, RA_IGNORED);
@@ -1401,7 +1394,6 @@ static int handle_hypercall(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
int ret;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
ret = s390_virtio_hypercall(env);
if (ret == -EINVAL) {
kvm_s390_program_interrupt(cpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
@@ -1416,7 +1408,6 @@ static void kvm_handle_diag_288(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
uint64_t r1, r3;
int rc;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
r1 = (run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0x00f0) >> 4;
r3 = run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0x000f;
rc = handle_diag_288(&cpu->env, r1, r3);
@@ -1429,7 +1420,6 @@ static void kvm_handle_diag_308(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
{
uint64_t r1, r3;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
r1 = (run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0x00f0) >> 4;
r3 = run->s390_sieic.ipa & 0x000f;
handle_diag_308(&cpu->env, r1, r3, RA_IGNORED);
@@ -1440,8 +1430,6 @@ static int handle_sw_breakpoint(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
unsigned long pc;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
-
pc = env->psw.addr - sw_bp_ilen;
if (kvm_find_sw_breakpoint(CPU(cpu), pc)) {
env->psw.addr = pc;
@@ -1493,8 +1481,6 @@ static int kvm_s390_handle_sigp(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t ipa1, uint32_t ipb)
int ret;
uint8_t order;
- cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
-
/* get order code */
order = decode_basedisp_rs(env, ipb, NULL) & SIGP_ORDER_MASK;
@@ -1556,7 +1542,6 @@ static int handle_oper_loop(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
PSW oldpsw, newpsw;
- cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
newpsw.mask = ldq_phys(cs->as, cpu->env.psa +
offsetof(LowCore, program_new_psw));
newpsw.addr = ldq_phys(cs->as, cpu->env.psa +
@@ -1609,7 +1594,6 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu)
break;
case ICPT_WAITPSW:
/* disabled wait, since enabled wait is handled in kernel */
- cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
s390_handle_wait(cpu);
r = EXCP_HALTED;
break;
@@ -1651,8 +1635,6 @@ static int handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu)
struct kvm_run *run = cs->kvm_run;
int ret;
- cpu_synchronize_state(cs);
-
ret = ioinst_handle_tsch(cpu, cpu->env.regs[1], run->s390_tsch.ipb,
RA_IGNORED);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -1778,6 +1760,8 @@ int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run)
qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
+ cpu_synchronize_state(CPU(cpu));
+
switch (run->exit_reason) {
case KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC:
ret = handle_intercept(cpu);
--
2.14.3
next reply other threads:[~2018-03-26 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-26 9:20 David Hildenbrand [this message]
2018-03-26 9:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] s390x/kvm: call cpu_synchronize_state() on every kvm_arch_handle_exit() David Hildenbrand
2018-04-05 7:53 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-04-05 8:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-04-05 8:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-04-05 8:19 ` Thomas Huth
2018-04-05 8:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180326092036.12780-1-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.