From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/8] dm-bufio patches
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:57:47 -0400
Message-ID: <20180326185746.GA22409@redhat.com>
References: <20180326182939.169591126@debian.vm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180326182939.169591126@debian.vm>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
To: mpatocka@redhat.com
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, agk@redhat.com
List-Id: dm-devel.ids

On Mon, Mar 26 2018 at  2:29pm -0400,
mpatocka@redhat.com <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> Here I'm sending the second version of dm-bufio patches for arbitrary
> sector size.
> 
> I dropped the patch that removes alloc_pages because it turns out that
> alloc_pages is faster than the slab allocator.

I had already staged the previous set, so I need to go back over that
and update accordingly.

> I also added a patch that removes struct bio from struct dm_buffer
> (reducing the size of dm_buffer to 1/3) and allocates the bio only when
> doing read or write.

OK, I'll go over your new set and try to tease out any differences.

Mike