All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	willy@infradead.org, adobriyan@gmail.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
	mguzik@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] mm: introduce arg_lock to protect arg_start|end and env_start|end in mm_struct
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:38:34 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327073834.GI2236@uranus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ceaa72ee-a63a-983b-d040-387886f5599c@linux.alibaba.com>

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 06:12:55PM -0400, Yang Shi wrote:
> > +	if (unlikely(arg_start > arg_end || env_start > env_end)) {
> > +		cond_resched();
> > +		goto retry;
> 
> Can't it trap into dead loop if the condition is always false?

Yes, unfortunately it can.

> > +	}
> > 
> > for reading these fields.
> > 
> > By the way, /proc/pid/ readers are serving as a canary who tells something
> > mm_mmap related problem is happening. On the other hand, it is sad that
> > such canary cannot be terminated by signal due to use of unkillable waits.
> > I wish we can use killable waits.
> 
> I already proposed patches (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/2/26/1197) to do this
> a few weeks ago. In the review, akpm suggested mitigate the mmap_sem
> contention instead of using killable version workaround. Then the
> preliminary unmaping by section patches
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/20/786) were proposed. In the discussion, we
> decided to eliminate the mmap_sem abuse, this is where the patch came from.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-27  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-26 18:20 [v2 PATCH] mm: introduce arg_lock to protect arg_start|end and env_start|end in mm_struct Yang Shi
2018-03-26 18:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-26 19:21   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2018-03-26 21:10     ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-26 21:20       ` Yang Shi
2018-03-26 21:29       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2018-03-26 22:00         ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-26 22:12           ` Yang Shi
2018-03-27  7:38             ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2018-03-27  7:37           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2018-03-26 21:59     ` Yang Shi
2018-03-27  7:32       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2018-03-27 18:44         ` Yang Shi
2018-03-26 19:42 ` Mateusz Guzik
2018-03-26 21:10   ` Yang Shi
2018-03-27  6:29 ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-27 14:31   ` Mateusz Guzik
2018-03-27 14:43     ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-27 18:38   ` Yang Shi
2018-03-27 18:52     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2018-03-28 13:10       ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-02  1:58   ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180327073834.GI2236@uranus \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mguzik@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.