From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bcrl@kvack.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, kent.overstreet@gmail.com,
security@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] fs/aio: Use rcu_work instead of explicit rcu and work item
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 08:55:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180327155506.GA2779604@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180327142848.GA19341@redhat.com>
Hey,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:28:48PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > flush_*work() guarantees to wait for the completion of the latest
> > instance of the work item which was visible to the caller. We can't
> > guarantee that w/o rcu_barrier().
>
> And this is what I can't understand.
>
> So let me repeat. Could you please describe a use-case which needs flush_rcuwork()
> with rcu_barrier() ?
So, if you skip that, flush_work() in itself won't wait for PENDING
bit at all. It'll return right away if the work item is waiting for
rcu grace period.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-27 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-14 19:41 [PATCHSET v2] percpu_ref, RCU: Audit RCU usages in percpu_ref users Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 1/8] fs/aio: Add explicit RCU grace period when freeing kioctx Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 2/8] fs/aio: Use RCU accessors for kioctx_table->table[] Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 3/8] RDMAVT: Fix synchronization around percpu_ref Tejun Heo
2018-03-15 22:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-03-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 4/8] HMM: Remove superflous RCU protection around radix tree lookup Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-26 14:54 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-26 14:54 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-27 16:12 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-03-27 16:12 ` Jerome Glisse
2018-03-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 5/8] percpu_ref: Update doc to dissuade users from depending on internal RCU grace periods Tejun Heo
2018-03-19 17:10 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 6/8] RCU, workqueue: Implement rcu_work Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 20:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-16 6:01 ` Lai Jiangshan
2018-03-19 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-20 10:04 ` Lai Jiangshan
2018-03-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 7/8] cgroup: Use rcu_work instead of explicit rcu and work item Tejun Heo
2018-03-14 19:45 ` [PATCH 8/8] fs/aio: " Tejun Heo
2018-03-19 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-21 15:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-03-21 16:40 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-21 17:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-03-21 17:53 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-22 11:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-03-26 15:04 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-27 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-03-27 15:55 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-03-29 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-03-29 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180327155506.GA2779604@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.