From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Aniruddha Banerjee <aniruddha.nitd@gmail.com>
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, aniruddhab@nvidia.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, vipink@nvidia.com, strasi@nvidia.com,
swarren@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, talho@nvidia.com,
treding@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] irqchip: arm-gic: take gic_lock when updating irq type
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 11:51:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180328095130.GA20664@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180328085430.3401-1-aniruddha.nitd@gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:24:30PM +0530, Aniruddha Banerjee wrote:
> The kernel documentation states that the locking of the irq-chip
> registers should be handled by the irq-chip driver. In the irq-gic,
> the accesses to the irqchip are seemingly not protected and multiple
> writes to SPIs from different irq descriptors do RMW requests without
> taking the irq-chip lock. When multiple irqs call the request_irq at
> the same time, there can be a simultaneous write at the gic
> distributor, leading to a race. Acquire the gic_lock when the
> irq_type is updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aniruddha Banerjee <aniruddhab@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes from V1:
>
> * Moved the spinlock from irq-gic to irq-gic common, so that the fix
> is valid for GIC v1/v2/v3.
>
> Change from V2:
>
> * Fixup the Signed-off-by line.
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-28 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-28 8:54 [PATCHv3] irqchip: arm-gic: take gic_lock when updating irq type Aniruddha Banerjee
2018-03-28 9:51 ` Greg KH [this message]
2018-03-28 12:21 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180328095130.GA20664@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=aniruddha.nitd@gmail.com \
--cc=aniruddhab@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=strasi@nvidia.com \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
--cc=talho@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=vipink@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.