From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 60439E009C8; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:46:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.223.170 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com (mail-io0-f170.google.com [209.85.223.170]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20AAE008D3 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d5so9267839iob.9 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:46:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=u3s4zsKy16Qhbp+poVallcmOFwLaiYzPJldMVKfui5w=; b=N8qZBUVx6DRN6Mai/A/FRqQU65+ezmdkOcqaTkyXT6xFWHGz9Ijbq1hJjLEdYUcvNh a2dYU+HHBqsWrEN9xgKeErK5nHQys/2UYg6YyYleoMjuGsp6qwLJpsGloJFpGztNGT3r TxJrcIT2a3TY7U+EfkOo7Euz5PDEInHdncKc+0kNFZflLLZ9WFSWCphhVgXa0yVQqU9I AHXXE/cw8UMIJ2jzyHlBMzgpHSLcz9pMmwoPobJ60ZswdaTizSzP7JxPLNNNcTDIVIMB TyHfuk7GDBprwxADvXoZaIky2fOfLGud6TcP1Z/G50RYTPvxUVPXagreRxZofA3gMPT+ qagw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=u3s4zsKy16Qhbp+poVallcmOFwLaiYzPJldMVKfui5w=; b=tOxLm7gpxjDexN375vH4hDj4p4AB9i7OOeBx7S/juT8xwlobe3EWwAYDOV5HoS6ld7 HdRY4V6uZ5YZ3c/OKEpcDp90ZwDsuS1lA8U+Gh0EhmcQ4NVXcW9wGyFYKLa7uVVy5rsy b+65Kh/+z7lM5agul1r7MoJ63Rg2WZgW3lTBILJ4fdXpFlCVp7uv/kGmn7xUnb2qjoTo jrNu/Uho2Fs5XiyDHd/jQzVnQDdTmvJS3jLIE8/FZx69Ava+G6/d8XhFqoqEd0Yg3GO9 NB7nKX9AhIeBEACkxehD6ggNry6qGIhi+LMcAr4aLHr53MzTrxn4AzSqujN9iJb5Fh5F xCsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GDQTqgMqYKtBNBlbWeNO8LHaHsDZihQgXsiF+7oYouBnamAv3l 3NMC0qlu5zdvsck9nkfJq12JZJUE X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49WlEDywma2Ajp6egvq52Q/HxYSwxkhvOPirQBkVlXVA3P7yYu59ldWZwnsMEIolWcX6cgVig== X-Received: by 10.107.24.66 with SMTP id 63mr7655631ioy.178.1522360018044; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux-uys3 ([206.248.190.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 199-v6sm2724itl.1.2018.03.29.14.46.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 17:46:54 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=BCller?= Message-ID: <20180329214654.GA25163@linux-uys3> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi] Has anybody run VC4 + X + recent meta/masters lately X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 21:46:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu 2018-03-29 @ 11:34:08 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:23 PM, Andreas Müller > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > >> I've seen the 'Modifier 0x0 vs. tiling(0x7000000000000001) mismatch' error > >> and blank screen hundreds of times while working on getting chromium-x11 > >> accelerated. It would happen if chromium was trying to use the system > >> gl/gles libraries instead of the ones it builds. > > Then you should give that patch a try - change is in mesa-megadriver > > package (building images after mesa changes takes LONG...) The solution was to let the two gl libraries install without interfering with each other (i.e. to separate locations). If I didn't install the ones chromium built, it would try to use the system ones and fail. If I installed both and it found its own, it would succeed. So I found a solution and didn't need to dig into this 'modifier vs tiling' issue. Having said that, I'm curious to try your patch on rpi3-64. I have never been able to get vc4 working on x11 with a 64-bit build (it also gives a 'modifier vs tiling' error). > > Some appetizer: glmark on mesa 17.1.7 reports 110 / glmark on mesa > > 17.1.7 reports 145! cool!