From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=+nlufJeqMJsaLmTaaNc5LUnax4e5aNFpmJTIgjLBebE=; b=bwyja7ac708u5S JVh10zxBlvRw1X5XyQPWMYgtJLe/Ylo7RvtBQIlovxE4ImUg5bIip9jT1d8lq4YCrQd4nph27F4bt H9Nx8IusUTIXzZy15rdUWM/Y24QziPGCof3WpcXFQVaUWFLGew+NgQVpkT+vxb4cv5nS5DeBKHiD0 8pqZEp7iYmN+sInCnXu6l5fg5Rb68lddFj1y0bKbbfGGyHQpKwQ7E+fOZ82pdRbs7rkHoIkizhLod 1RgIqvSpiv4p80gQhFsZdkHXE+P1PmCewh/U9OJ+hYslMoVInA26/lQewoVH+pwe9/i9tBSrzRLRT deqTbhzA4a0qjqgfYtHA==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rP839kcUD9EjGhv7bTmfK5Pj4Rph061Os5hmCpAD788=; b=U5bt/a5RP/tAiQOSAnAQFM3St bF1AVCqNH+b3kEStcxjCE2TZF4fT/mQwEIVAwf90+9hYRaxqZJ66GdlGzq7BproRsB+diNsQB0rQz qRtjeUufTBmC4ST/tpiQMq+efJ7MKH0TiTSyYEmkyQjlBRpObDet5Yl9DBxF5d4NBvCCZr4TANTRI BXOuSX3VklhmlZF1iDNdn6eIRGb3/A1E2XMhsUpQLxfl64qivFTMuoGdFYZeFDKXd4iuyTJimXI0J LLBAxcAu/VaswCmKpBhHpnZ/rIlM/6Ghj/nW2CKrTQLkB+AG658kgUjqDBG/EhSO96EXEcv917lgZ IdJGiVuAw==; Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1f1tuj-0001ce-Ny for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:18:05 +0000 Received: from mail-it0-f72.google.com ([209.85.214.72]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1f1tp0-0004pM-Ki for wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:11:58 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-f72.google.com with SMTP id 135-v6so1508267iti.0 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 06:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 08:09:45 -0500 From: Seth Forshee Message-ID: <20180330130945.GP18469@ubuntu-xps13> References: <20180306090923.GH6547@ubuntu-xps13> <20180322124802.GA3467@ubuntu-xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] wireless-regdb: add Short Range Devices (SRD) for Qatar List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "wireless-regdb" Errors-To: wireless-regdb-bounces+johannes=sipsolutions.net@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Faisal Wiryasantika Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 05:26:12PM +0300, Faisal Wiryasantika wrote: > Hello Seth, > > It's mentioned here: > http://www.motc.gov.qa/sites/default/files/qatar_national_frequency_allocation_table_qnfat_0.pdf > - page 64. Okay, so this is what I've come up with based on all the information I have: country QA: DFS-ETSI (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (50 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS (5725 - 5875 @ 80), (50 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40), NO-OUTDOOR Explanations for the differences from what you suggested: - In the letter you provided all ranges are listed as indoor only. - The power limits you had on some of the ranges were higher than what ware in the letter, so I have reduced them accordingly. - The letter says "with & without TPC" for some of the power limits, and I'm honestly not sure what is meant by that. So I've cut the limits in half for any ranges which require TPC as per the relevant ETSI standards, since we don't have support for TPC. Let me know if this looks correct to you, and if so I'll send a patch. Thanks, Seth > > > Best regards, > Faisal Wiryasantika > > > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Seth Forshee > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 07:21:22PM +0300, Faisal Wiryasantika wrote: > >> Dear Seth, > >> > >> > >> diff --git a/dbA.txt b/dbB.txt > >> index 990abf9..b28e654 100644 > >> --- a/dbA.txt > >> +++ b/dbB.txt > >> -country QA: DFS-JP > >> - (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) > >> - (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30) > >> +country QA: DFS-ETSI > >> + (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20) > >> + (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW > >> + (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW > >> + (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (200 mW), DFS > >> + # Short Range Devices (SRD) (ETSI EN 300 440) > >> + (5725 - 5875 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR > >> + # 60 GHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567 > >> + (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40) > >> > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Faisal Wiryasantika > > > > Thanks for all the information. I'm still a bit hesitant because > > documents I find on http://cra.gov.qa/ either do not show these updates > > or else they are documents for proposed updates. The letter you supplied > > seems to indicate that the changes may have just recently gone into > > effect, however I can't find any public information which says the same. > > Do you know why the public documents have not yet been updated? > > > > Thanks, > > Seth _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb