All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/psr: Move PSR exit specific code to hardware specific function
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 11:09:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180402180917.GO2338@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180330222336.5262-2-jose.souza@intel.com>

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 03:23:27PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> To proper execute PSR exit it was using 'if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv))' to
> differentiate between VLV/CHV and HSW+ hardware, so here moving each
> hardware handling to his own function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 5373b171bb96..a8d300280a2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -617,6 +617,7 @@ struct i915_psr {
>  	void (*enable_sink)(struct intel_dp *);
>  	void (*activate)(struct intel_dp *);
>  	void (*setup_vsc)(struct intel_dp *, const struct intel_crtc_state *);
> +	void (*exit)(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  };
>  
>  enum intel_pch {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index fc7c36efd401..bcaac9e69f8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -838,53 +838,67 @@ static void intel_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  }
>  
> -static void intel_psr_exit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +static void hsw_psr_exit(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> -	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
> -	struct drm_crtc *crtc = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.crtc;
> +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> +	struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> +		val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL);
> +		WARN_ON(!(val & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE));
> +		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR2_CTL, val & ~EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
> +	} else {
> +		val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL);
> +		WARN_ON(!(val & EDP_PSR_ENABLE));
> +		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void vlv_psr_exit(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> +	struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> +	struct drm_crtc *crtc = dig_port->base.base.crtc;
>  	enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
>  	u32 val;
>  
> -	if (!dev_priv->psr.active)
> -		return;
> +	val = I915_READ(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe));
>  
> -	if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
> -		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled) {
> -			val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR2_CTL);
> -			WARN_ON(!(val & EDP_PSR2_ENABLE));
> -			I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR2_CTL, val & ~EDP_PSR2_ENABLE);
> -		} else {
> -			val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL);
> -			WARN_ON(!(val & EDP_PSR_ENABLE));
> -			I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		val = I915_READ(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe));
> +	/*
> +	 * Here we do the transition drirectly from
> +	 * PSR_state 3 (active - no Remote Frame Buffer (RFB) update) to
> +	 * PSR_state 5 (exit).
> +	 * PSR State 4 (active with single frame update) can be skipped.
> +	 * On PSR_state 5 (exit) Hardware is responsible to transition
> +	 * back to PSR_state 1 (inactive).
> +	 * Now we are at Same state after vlv_psr_enable_source.
> +	 */
> +	val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_ACTIVE_ENTRY;
> +	I915_WRITE(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe), val);
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Here we do the transition drirectly from
> -		 * PSR_state 3 (active - no Remote Frame Buffer (RFB) update) to
> -		 * PSR_state 5 (exit).
> -		 * PSR State 4 (active with single frame update) can be skipped.
> -		 * On PSR_state 5 (exit) Hardware is responsible to transition
> -		 * back to PSR_state 1 (inactive).
> -		 * Now we are at Same state after vlv_psr_enable_source.
> -		 */
> -		val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_ACTIVE_ENTRY;
> -		I915_WRITE(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe), val);
> +	/*
> +	 * Send AUX wake up - Spec says after transitioning to PSR
> +	 * active we have to send AUX wake up by writing 01h in DPCD
> +	 * 600h of sink device.
> +	 * XXX: This might slow down the transition, but without this
> +	 * HW doesn't complete the transition to PSR_state 1 and we
> +	 * never get the screen updated.
> +	 */
> +	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER,
> +			   DP_SET_POWER_D0);
> +}
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Send AUX wake up - Spec says after transitioning to PSR
> -		 * active we have to send AUX wake up by writing 01h in DPCD
> -		 * 600h of sink device.
> -		 * XXX: This might slow down the transition, but without this
> -		 * HW doesn't complete the transition to PSR_state 1 and we
> -		 * never get the screen updated.
> -		 */
> -		drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER,
> -				   DP_SET_POWER_D0);
> -	}
> +static void intel_psr_exit(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;
> +
> +	if (!dev_priv->psr.active)
> +		return;
>  
> +	dev_priv->psr.exit(intel_dp);
>  	dev_priv->psr.active = false;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1094,6 +1108,7 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		dev_priv->psr.enable_sink = vlv_psr_enable_sink;
>  		dev_priv->psr.activate = vlv_psr_activate;
>  		dev_priv->psr.setup_vsc = vlv_psr_setup_vsc;
> +		dev_priv->psr.exit = vlv_psr_exit;
>  	} else {
>  		dev_priv->psr.has_hw_tracking = true;
>  		dev_priv->psr.enable_source = hsw_psr_enable_source;
> @@ -1101,5 +1116,6 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		dev_priv->psr.enable_sink = hsw_psr_enable_sink;
>  		dev_priv->psr.activate = hsw_psr_activate;
>  		dev_priv->psr.setup_vsc = hsw_psr_setup_vsc;
> +		dev_priv->psr.exit = hsw_psr_exit;
>  	}
>  }
> -- 
> 2.16.3
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-02 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-30 22:23 [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/psr: Move specific HSW+ WARN_ON to HSW+ function José Roberto de Souza
2018-03-30 22:23 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/psr: Move PSR exit specific code to hardware specific function José Roberto de Souza
2018-04-02 18:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2018-03-30 22:23 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/psr: Share code between disable and exit José Roberto de Souza
2018-04-02 18:11   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-02 21:15     ` Souza, Jose
2018-03-30 22:23 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/psr: Remove intel_crtc_state parameter from disable() José Roberto de Souza
2018-04-02 18:13   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-03 17:52   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-03-30 22:23 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/psr: Export intel_psr_activate/exit() José Roberto de Souza
2018-04-02 18:18   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-30 22:23 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/psr: Add intel_psr_activate_block_get()/put() José Roberto de Souza
2018-04-02 18:20   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-02 22:11     ` Souza, Jose
2018-04-03 17:32       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-30 22:23 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/dp: Exit PSR before do a aux channel transaction José Roberto de Souza
2018-04-02 18:23   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-02 18:42     ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-04-02 22:16       ` Souza, Jose
2018-04-02 23:21         ` Souza, Jose
2018-04-02 19:00     ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2018-04-02 22:15       ` Souza, Jose
2018-03-30 22:23 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Keep IGT PSR and frontbuffer tests functional José Roberto de Souza
2018-04-02 18:26   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-30 22:23 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/psr: Begin to handle PSR/PSR2 errors set by sink José Roberto de Souza
2018-04-02 18:28   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-03-30 22:23 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/psr: Handle PSR RFB storage error José Roberto de Souza
2018-03-30 22:23 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/psr/bdw+: Enable CRC check in the static frame on the sink side José Roberto de Souza
2018-03-30 22:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915/psr: Move specific HSW+ WARN_ON to HSW+ function Patchwork
2018-03-30 22:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2018-04-02 18:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] " Rodrigo Vivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180402180917.GO2338@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.