All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/dp: fix compliance test adjustments
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 12:59:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180405195925.GE22063@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d78dc6348aa55c70de0273af3231a256c40d3125.1522938790.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:39:05PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Abstract compliance test adjustments to a single function. Also make the
> bpc adjustments affect the limits, actually forcing the bpc. Seems like
> directly changing the pipe_bpp in the past could not have been
> effective.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Looks good to me w.r.t compliance test request parameters.

Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index c98626b3af65..4ddb9dc61f46 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1666,14 +1666,6 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	if (bpc > 0)
>  		bpp = min(bpp, 3*bpc);
>  
> -	/* For DP Compliance we override the computed bpp for the pipe */
> -	if (intel_dp->compliance.test_data.bpc != 0) {
> -		pipe_config->pipe_bpp =	3*intel_dp->compliance.test_data.bpc;
> -		pipe_config->dither_force_disable = pipe_config->pipe_bpp == 6*3;
> -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Setting pipe_bpp to %d\n",
> -			      pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
> -	}
> -
>  	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
>  		/* Get bpp from vbt only for panels that dont have bpp in edid */
>  		if (intel_connector->base.display_info.bpc == 0 &&
> @@ -1704,6 +1696,42 @@ static bool intel_edp_compare_alt_mode(struct drm_display_mode *m1,
>  	return bres;
>  }
>  
> +/* Adjust link config limits based on compliance test requests. */
> +static void
> +intel_dp_adjust_compliance_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +				  struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> +				  struct link_config_limits *limits)
> +{
> +	/* For DP Compliance we override the computed bpp for the pipe */
> +	if (intel_dp->compliance.test_data.bpc != 0) {
> +		int bpp = 3 * intel_dp->compliance.test_data.bpc;
> +
> +		limits->min_bpp = limits->max_bpp = bpp;
> +		pipe_config->dither_force_disable = bpp == 6 * 3;
> +
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Setting pipe_bpp to %d\n", bpp);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Use values requested by Compliance Test Request */
> +	if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> +		int index;
> +
> +		/* Validate the compliance test data since max values
> +		 * might have changed due to link train fallback.
> +		 */
> +		if (intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate,
> +					       intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count)) {
> +			index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> +						    intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> +						    intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> +			if (index >= 0)
> +				limits->min_clock = limits->max_clock = index;
> +			limits->min_lane_count = limits->max_lane_count =
> +				intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /* Optimize link config in order: max bpp, min clock, min lanes */
>  static bool
>  intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> @@ -1764,24 +1792,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  	limits.min_bpp = 6 * 3;
>  	limits.max_bpp = intel_dp_compute_bpp(intel_dp, pipe_config);
>  
> -	/* Use values requested by Compliance Test Request */
> -	if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
> -		int index;
> -
> -		/* Validate the compliance test data since max values
> -		 * might have changed due to link train fallback.
> -		 */
> -		if (intel_dp_link_params_valid(intel_dp, intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate,
> -					       intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count)) {
> -			index = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->common_rates,
> -						    intel_dp->num_common_rates,
> -						    intel_dp->compliance.test_link_rate);
> -			if (index >= 0)
> -				limits.min_clock = limits.max_clock = index;
> -			limits.min_lane_count = limits.max_lane_count = intel_dp->compliance.test_lane_count;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
>  	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Use the maximum clock and number of lanes the eDP panel
> @@ -1794,6 +1804,8 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  		limits.min_clock = limits.max_clock;
>  	}
>  
> +	intel_dp_adjust_compliance_config(intel_dp, pipe_config, &limits);
> +
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
>  		      "max rate %d max bpp %d pixel clock %iKHz\n",
>  		      limits.max_lane_count,
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-05 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-05 14:38 [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915/dp: link config compute refactoring Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/dp: remove stale comment about bw constants Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 17:10   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-05 18:46   ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/dp: move link_bw and rate_select debugging where used Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 17:22   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-04-05 19:03     ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/dp: abstract dp link config computation from the rest Jani Nikula
2018-04-25 19:03   ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/dp: move eDP VBT bpp claming code to intel_dp_compute_bpp() Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 19:44   ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/dp: group link config limits in a struct Jani Nikula
2018-04-25 19:07   ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/dp: abstract link config selection Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 19:55   ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-09 14:12     ` Jani Nikula
2018-04-09 18:22       ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-26  1:43       ` Manasi Navare
2018-04-05 14:39 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/dp: fix compliance test adjustments Jani Nikula
2018-04-05 19:59   ` Manasi Navare [this message]
2018-04-05 14:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: link config compute refactoring Patchwork
2018-04-05 15:06 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-04-05 18:35 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180405195925.GE22063@intel.com \
    --to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.