From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:47:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20180406144701.GO17495@lunn.ch> References: <27c05ec7-1f85-8e4a-be06-70d6d80e8a10@synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Florian Fainelli , David Miller , Jakub Jelinek , Jeff Garzik , Tim Hockin , Eli Kupermann , Chris Leech , Scott Feldman , Ben Hutchings , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Joao Pinto To: Jose Abreu Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:52431 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752489AbeDFOr2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:47:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27c05ec7-1f85-8e4a-be06-70d6d80e8a10@synopsys.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:51:15PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote: > Hi Florian, > > On 05-04-2018 16:50, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > On 04/05/2018 03:47 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I would like to know your opinion regarding adding support for > >> driver private ioctl's in ethtool. > >> > >> Background: Synopsys Ethernet IP's have a certain number of > >> features which can be reconfigured at runtime. Giving you two > >> examples: One of the most recent one is the safety features, > >> which can be enabled/disabled and forced at runtime. Hi Jose Is there a reason somebody would decide to use the Ethernet in 'unsafe' mode? Cannot you just turn it on by default? Andrew