From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 19:54:27 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: open list , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux- stable Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.16 00/31] 4.16.1-stable review Message-ID: <20180407175427.GA23053@kroah.com> References: <20180406084340.999820380@linuxfoundation.org> <20180407122815.GA2399@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:37:33PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > >> Results from Linaro’s test farm. > >> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64. > >> > >> Summary > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> kernel: 4.16.1-rc1 > >> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > >> git branch: linux-4.16.y > >> git commit: 30380aa579224caf6a737160802151f466fe3953 > >> git describe: v4.16-32-g30380aa57922 > >> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.16-oe/build/v4.16-32-g30380aa57922 > >> > >> No regressions (compared to build ) > > > > Compared to what build? :) > > There is no previous build to compare. > stable-rc 4.16 is the new build in our system. > This build results will act as base line for coming up 4.16 builds. Why were you all not testing 4.16-rc releases and the final 4.16.0 release? For some reason I thought you all were doing that. thanks, greg k-h