From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] preadv/preadv03.c: Add new testcase
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:57:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180409125757.GA26048@rei.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523244278-17751-1-git-send-email-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hi!
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/.gitignore
> index eea606e..ec2af68 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/.gitignore
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/.gitignore
> @@ -696,6 +696,8 @@
> /preadv/preadv01_64
> /preadv/preadv02
> /preadv/preadv02_64
> +/preadv/preadv03
> +/preadv/preadv03_64
> /profil/profil01
> /pselect/pselect01
> /pselect/pselect01_64
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv/preadv03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv/preadv03.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..077063a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/preadv/preadv03.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 FUJITSU LIMITED. All rights reserved.
> + * Author: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
Can we use GPLv2+ instead of GPLv2 please?
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but
> + * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * alone with this program.
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * Test Name: preadv03
I would avoid the test name here as it does not add any useful
information.
> + * Test Description:
> + * Check the basic functionality of the preadv(2) for the file
> + * opened with O_DIRECT in all filesystem.
> + * Preadv(2) should succeed to read the expected content of data
> + * and after reading the file, the file offset is not changed.
> + */
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <sys/uio.h>
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +#include <sys/mount.h>
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "preadv.h"
> +
> +#define MNTPOINT "mntpoint"
> +#define FNAME MNTPOINT"/file"
> +
> +static int fd, blksz;
> +static off_t org_off, tst_off;
^
The tst_ prefix is reserved for the test library, you should
not use it when naming test variables/functions.
> +static ssize_t exp_sz;
> +static char *pop_buf;
> +static struct iovec *rd_iovec;
> +
> +static struct tcase {
> + int count;
> + off_t *offset;
> + ssize_t *size;
> + char content;
> +} tcases[] = {
> + {1, &org_off, &exp_sz, 0x61},
> + {2, &org_off, &exp_sz, 0x61},
> + {1, &tst_off, &exp_sz, 0x62},
> +};
> +
> +static void verify_direct_preadv(unsigned int n)
> +{
> + int i;
> + char *vec;
> + struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
> +
> + vec = rd_iovec->iov_base;
> + memset(vec, 0x00, blksz);
> +
> + SAFE_LSEEK(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
> +
> + TEST(preadv(fd, rd_iovec, tc->count, *tc->offset));
> + if (TEST_RETURN < 0) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "Preadv(O_DIRECT) fails");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (TEST_RETURN != *tc->size) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Preadv(O_DIRECT) read %li bytes, expected %zi",
> + TEST_RETURN, *tc->size);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < *tc->size; i++) {
> + if (vec[i] != tc->content)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (i < *tc->size) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Buffer wrong at %i have %02x expected %02x",
> + i, vec[i], tc->content);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (SAFE_LSEEK(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR) != 0) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Preadv(O_DIRECT) has changed file offset");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + tst_res(TPASS, "Preadv(O_DIRECT) read %zi bytes successfully "
> + "with content '%c' expectedly", *tc->size, tc->content);
> +}
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + int dev_fd;
> +
> + dev_fd = SAFE_OPEN(tst_device->dev, O_RDWR);
> + if (ioctl(dev_fd, BLKSSZGET, &blksz)) {
> + SAFE_CLOSE(dev_fd);
> + tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "ioctl(%s, BLKSSZGET) failed",
> + tst_device->dev);
> + }
We do have SAFE_IOCTL() now :-).
> + SAFE_CLOSE(dev_fd);
> + tst_off = blksz;
> + exp_sz = blksz;
> +
> + fd = SAFE_OPEN(FNAME, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_DIRECT, 0644);
> +
> + pop_buf = SAFE_MEMALIGN(blksz, blksz);
> + memset(pop_buf, 0x61, blksz);
> + SAFE_WRITE(1, fd, pop_buf, blksz);
> +
> + memset(pop_buf, 0x62, blksz);
> + SAFE_WRITE(1, fd, pop_buf, blksz);
> +
> + rd_iovec = SAFE_MEMALIGN(blksz, blksz + sizeof(size_t));
Also I do not think that we actually have to align the iovec structure,
AFAIC only the actual buffer, i.e. iov_base.
> + rd_iovec->iov_base = SAFE_MEMALIGN(blksz, blksz);
> + rd_iovec->iov_len = blksz;
Also looking at the testcase definition, we pass iovcnt == 2 there but
initialize only the first one here. I suppose that for the original
testcase we relied on the fact that the global variable rd_iovec was
initialized to 0 but that does not hold true for allocated memory.
Anyway we should either set rd_iovec[1].iov_base = NULL and
rd_iovec[1].iov_len = 0 or make it static global variable again...
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> + free(pop_buf);
> + free(rd_iovec->iov_base);
> + free(rd_iovec);
> +
> + if (fd > 0)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
> + .setup = setup,
> + .cleanup = cleanup,
> + .test = verify_direct_preadv,
> + .min_kver = "2.6.30",
> + .mntpoint = MNTPOINT,
> + .mount_device = 1,
> + .all_filesystems = 1,
> +};
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
>
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-09 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-30 8:53 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] syscalls/preadv01: Run test for all filesystems Xiao Yang
2018-03-30 8:53 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] syscalls/pwritev01: " Xiao Yang
2018-04-05 9:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] syscalls/preadv01: " Cyril Hrubis
2018-04-05 10:56 ` Xiao Yang
2018-04-05 11:02 ` Cyril Hrubis
2018-04-06 10:50 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] preadv/preadv03.c: Add new testcase Xiao Yang
2018-04-06 10:50 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] pwritev/pwritev03.c: " Xiao Yang
2018-04-06 13:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] preadv/preadv03.c: " Cyril Hrubis
2018-04-09 3:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 " Xiao Yang
2018-04-09 3:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 2/2] pwritev/pwritev03.c: " Xiao Yang
2018-04-09 12:57 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2018-04-10 2:32 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] preadv/preadv03.c: " Xiao Yang
2018-04-10 2:32 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] pwritev/pwritev03.c: " Xiao Yang
2018-04-12 11:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] preadv/preadv03.c: " Cyril Hrubis
2018-04-10 2:42 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 " Xiao Yang
2018-04-09 3:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 " Xiao Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180409125757.GA26048@rei.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.