From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44273) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5tVL-0003WL-0O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:40:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5tVG-00048n-Pt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:40:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:40:05 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20180410134004.GC22304@flamenco> References: <1523038800-2494-1-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> <20180409161101.GB18168@flamenco> <565df28d-2f24-1065-c00a-4cceaf5428b4@linaro.org> <20180410130318.GB22304@flamenco> <17f92de0-f659-7770-8d78-92535cadb232@mail.uni-paderborn.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17f92de0-f659-7770-8d78-92535cadb232@mail.uni-paderborn.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/17] Translation loop conversion for sh4/sparc/mips/s390x/openrisc/riscv targets List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bastian Koppelmann Cc: Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Palmer Dabbelt , Sagar Karandikar , David Hildenbrand , Mark Cave-Ayland , Cornelia Huck , Alexander Graf , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Michael Clark , Artyom Tarasenko , Stafford Horne , Yongbok Kim , Aurelien Jarno On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 15:16:19 +0200, Bastian Koppelmann wrote: > On 04/10/2018 03:03 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 14:24:23 +1000, Richard Henderson wrote: > >> On 04/10/2018 02:11 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 16:01:36 +0200, Bastian Koppelmann wrote: > >>>> Thanks for doing this grunt work. Me and a colleague were planning to do > >>>> this as well after converting the RISC-V frontend to decodetree. Do you > >>>> have any plans to do this for the TriCore frontend as well? I have the > >>>> same plan for Tricore: Convert it to decodetree, then to translation loop. > >>> > >>> I won't do any further conversions in the near future, so please go > >>> ahead with your plans :-) > >> > >> In which case I won't review Emilio's final two patches for risc-v. > > I'm confused as well :). I don't understand why Richard is not reviewing > the last two patch. Maybe you can clarify as well, Richard. I think he understood you already had patches (not yet on-list) to do the trloop conversion for riscv, and therefore my patches should be discarded. > > I might be mistaken but my impression is that Bastian would be happy taking > > these risc-v patches (w/ a minor correction, already noted) since he > > has not yet started the TranslatorOps conversion he planned. > > > > Bastian, can you please clarify? > > Sure, I can take the three RISC-V patches into my tree and send a pull > as soon as the next development cycle start. Note that the first patch in this series does change the TranslatorOps interface, that's why I think the whole series should go through the same tree (Richard's TCG tree, I presume). Thanks, E.