From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Assume maintainership of ARM reference designs
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 15:02:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180412140201.GI16141@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdaL13zAOa1YQuWx+Y=2jCT6NfB60g_Dxg5mVp7NebY_Yw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 03:59:20PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > The Versatile Express
> > CT9x4 is still part of the boot farm, and just about works with
> > certain kernels, but I'm pretty sure there's a cache latency bug
> > there (I carry patches privately to fix it, but it doesn't appear to
> > completely solve it.)
>
> So there is a bug in it! I thought it was only my board.
I'm not sure if it's a hardware bug or not... This patch seems to
help immensely, but doesn't completely solve the problem:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca9.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca9.dts
index 5814460e0549..56308c1c0208 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca9.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca9.dts
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
cache-unified;
cache-level = <2>;
arm,data-latency = <1 1 1>;
- arm,tag-latency = <1 1 1>;
+ arm,tag-latency = <2 2 1>;
};
pmu {
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-12 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-12 13:14 [PATCH] ARM: Assume maintainership of ARM reference designs Linus Walleij
2018-04-12 13:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 13:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 13:44 ` Linus Walleij
2018-04-12 13:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-04-12 13:59 ` Linus Walleij
2018-04-12 14:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2018-04-12 14:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-04-12 13:22 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-04-12 13:31 ` Marc Zyngier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-27 7:37 Linus Walleij
2018-09-27 8:25 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-09-27 8:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-09-27 18:49 ` Olof Johansson
2018-09-27 22:04 ` Mark Brown
2018-09-28 7:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-28 8:46 ` Linus Walleij
2018-09-28 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-27 22:55 ` Michael Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180412140201.GI16141@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.