From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, hendersm@shaw.ca,
bhelgaas@google.com, tiwai@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [patch 01/27] resource: fix integer overflow at reallocation
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 15:35:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180413223513.SWylt%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: resource: fix integer overflow at reallocation
We've got a bug report indicating a kernel panic at booting on an x86-32
system, and it turned out to be the invalid PCI resource assigned after
reallocation. __find_resource() first aligns the resource start address
and resets the end address with start+size-1 accordingly, then checks
whether it's contained. Here the end address may overflow the integer,
although resource_contains() still returns true because the function
validates only start and end address. So this ends up with returning an
invalid resource (start > end).
There was already an attempt to cover such a problem in the commit
47ea91b4052d ("Resource: fix wrong resource window calculation"), but this
case is an overseen one.
This patch adds the validity check of the newly calculated resource for
avoiding the integer overflow problem.
Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1086739
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/s5hpo37d5l8.wl-tiwai@suse.de
Fixes: 23c570a67448 ("resource: ability to resize an allocated resource")
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reported-by: Michael Henders <hendersm@shaw.ca>
Tested-by: Michael Henders <hendersm@shaw.ca>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/resource.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN kernel/resource.c~resource-fix-integer-overflow-at-reallocation-v1 kernel/resource.c
--- a/kernel/resource.c~resource-fix-integer-overflow-at-reallocation-v1
+++ a/kernel/resource.c
@@ -651,7 +651,8 @@ static int __find_resource(struct resour
alloc.start = constraint->alignf(constraint->alignf_data, &avail,
size, constraint->align);
alloc.end = alloc.start + size - 1;
- if (resource_contains(&avail, &alloc)) {
+ if (alloc.start <= alloc.end &&
+ resource_contains(&avail, &alloc)) {
new->start = alloc.start;
new->end = alloc.end;
return 0;
_
reply other threads:[~2018-04-13 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180413223513.SWylt%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hendersm@shaw.ca \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.