All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpufeature: guard asm_volatile_goto usage with CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:11:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180414101112.GX4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a65f6542-8754-ea84-d1bf-076349b6b288@fb.com>

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 01:42:14PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 4/13/18 11:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:28:04PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > Instead of
> > > #ifdef CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO
> > > we can replace it with
> > > #ifndef __BPF__
> > > or some other name,
> > 
> > I would prefer the BPF specific hack; otherwise we might be encouraging
> > people to build the kernel proper without asm-goto.
> > 
> 
> I don't understand this concern.

The thing is; this will be a (temporary) BPF specific hack. Hiding it
behind something that looks 'normal' (CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) is just not
right.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-14 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10 20:42 [PATCH] x86/cpufeature: guard asm_volatile_goto usage with CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO Yonghong Song
2018-04-10 21:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-10 21:28   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-04-13 18:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-13 20:42       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-04-14 10:11         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-04-14 20:30           ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180414101112.GX4064@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.