From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: PATCH V4 0/5 nvme-pci: fixes on nvme_timeout and nvme_dev_disable
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 23:17:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180417151700.GC16286@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1520489971-31174-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018@02:19:26PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> Firstly, really appreciate Keith and Sagi's precious advice on previous versions.
> And this is the version 4.
>
> Some patches of the previous patchset have been submitted and the left is this patchset
> which has been refactored. Please consider it for 4.17.
>
> The target of this patchset is to avoid nvme_dev_disable to be invoked by nvme_timeout.
> As we know, nvme_dev_disable will issue commands on adminq, if the controller no response,
> it has to depend on timeout path. However, nvme_timeout will also need to invoke
> nvme_dev_disable. This will introduce dangerous circular dependence. Moreover,
> nvme_dev_disable is under the shutdown_lock, even when it go to sleep, this makes things
> worse.
>
> The basic idea of this patchset is:
> - When need to schedule reset_work, hand over expired requests to nvme_dev_disable. They
> will be completed after the controller is disabled/shtudown.
>
> - When requests from nvme_dev_disable and nvme_reset_work expires, disable the controller
> directly then the request could be completed to wakeup the waiter.
>
> The 'disable the controller directly' here means that it doesn't send commands on adminq.
> A new interface is introduced for this, nvme_pci_disable_ctrl_directly. More details,
> please refer to the comment of the function.
>
> Then nvme_timeout doesn't depends on nvme_dev_disable any more.
>
> Because there is big difference from previous version, and some relatively independent patches
> have been submitted, so I just reserve the key part of previous version change log following.
>
> Change V3->V4
> - refactor the interfaces flushing in-flight requests and add them to nvme core.
> - refactor the nvme_timeout to make it more clearly
>
> Change V2->V3:
> - discard the patch which unfreeze the queue after nvme_dev_disable
>
> Changes V1->V2:
> - disable PCI controller bus master in nvme_pci_disable_ctrl_directly
>
> There are 5 patches:
> 1st one is to change the operations on nvme_request->flags to atomic operations, then we could introduce
> another NVME_REQ_ABORTED next.
> 2nd patch introduce two new interfaces to flush in-flight requests in nvme core.
> 3rd patch is to avoid the nvme_dev_disable in nvme_timeout, it introduce new interface nvme_pci_disable_ctrl_directly
> and refactor the nvme_timeout
> 4th~5th is to fix issues introduced after 3rd patch.
>
> Jianchao Wang (5)
> 0001-nvme-do-atomically-bit-operations-on-nvme_request.fl.patch
> 0002-nvme-add-helper-interface-to-flush-in-flight-request.patch
> 0003-nvme-pci-avoid-nvme_dev_disable-to-be-invoked-in-nvm.patch
> 0004-nvme-pci-discard-wait-timeout-when-delete-cq-sq.patch
> 0005-nvme-pci-add-the-timeout-case-for-DELETEING-state.patch
>
> diff stat
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 4 +-
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
>
Hi Jianchao,
Looks blktest(block/011) can trigger IO hang easily on NVMe PCI device,
and all are related with nvme_dev_disable():
1) admin queue may be disabled by nvme_dev_disable() from timeout path
during resetting, then reset can't move on
2) the nvme_dev_disable() called from nvme_reset_work() may cause double
completion on timed-out request
So could you share us what your plan is about this patchset?
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-08 6:19 PATCH V4 0/5 nvme-pci: fixes on nvme_timeout and nvme_dev_disable Jianchao Wang
2018-03-08 6:19 ` [PATCH V4 1/5] nvme: do atomically bit operations on nvme_request.flags Jianchao Wang
2018-03-08 7:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-08 14:32 ` jianchao.wang
2018-03-08 6:19 ` [PATCH V4 2/5] nvme: add helper interface to flush in-flight requests Jianchao Wang
2018-03-08 13:11 ` Ming Lei
2018-03-08 14:44 ` jianchao.wang
2018-03-08 18:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-03-09 1:59 ` jianchao.wang
2018-03-08 6:19 ` [PATCH V4 3/5] nvme-pci: avoid nvme_dev_disable to be invoked in nvme_timeout Jianchao Wang
2018-03-09 2:01 ` jianchao.wang
2018-03-13 13:29 ` jianchao.wang
2018-03-08 6:19 ` [PATCH V4 4/5] nvme-pci: discard wait timeout when delete cq/sq Jianchao Wang
2018-03-08 6:19 ` [PATCH V4 5/5] nvme-pci: add the timeout case for DELETEING state Jianchao Wang
2018-04-17 15:17 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-04-18 14:24 ` PATCH V4 0/5 nvme-pci: fixes on nvme_timeout and nvme_dev_disable jianchao.wang
2018-04-18 15:40 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-19 1:51 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-19 2:27 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180417151700.GC16286@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.