From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] atomic_ops.rst: Fix wrong example code
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:55:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180419135544.GA26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180419084245.17096-1-sj38.park@gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 05:42:44PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Example code snippets for necessary of READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() has
> an unnecessary line of code and wrong condition. This commit fixes
> them.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Good catch!!! I queued and pushed both patches for further review,
thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
> index fce929144ccd..4ea4af71e68a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
> @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ If the compiler can prove that do_something() does not store to the
> variable a, then the compiler is within its rights transforming this to
> the following::
>
> - tmp = a;
> if (a > 0)
> for (;;)
> do_something();
> @@ -119,7 +118,7 @@ the following::
> If you don't want the compiler to do this (and you probably don't), then
> you should use something like the following::
>
> - while (READ_ONCE(a) < 0)
> + while (READ_ONCE(a) > 0)
> do_something();
>
> Alternatively, you could place a barrier() call in the loop.
> --
> 2.13.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] atomic_ops.rst: Fix wrong example code
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:55:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180419135544.GA26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180419084245.17096-1-sj38.park@gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 05:42:44PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Example code snippets for necessary of READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() has
> an unnecessary line of code and wrong condition. This commit fixes
> them.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Good catch!!! I queued and pushed both patches for further review,
thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
> index fce929144ccd..4ea4af71e68a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
> @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ If the compiler can prove that do_something() does not store to the
> variable a, then the compiler is within its rights transforming this to
> the following::
>
> - tmp = a;
> if (a > 0)
> for (;;)
> do_something();
> @@ -119,7 +118,7 @@ the following::
> If you don't want the compiler to do this (and you probably don't), then
> you should use something like the following::
>
> - while (READ_ONCE(a) < 0)
> + while (READ_ONCE(a) > 0)
> do_something();
>
> Alternatively, you could place a barrier() call in the loop.
> --
> 2.13.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-19 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-19 8:42 [PATCH 1/2] atomic_ops.rst: Fix wrong example code SeongJae Park
2018-04-19 8:42 ` SeongJae Park
2018-04-19 8:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] atomic_ops.rst: Use `warning` rst directive SeongJae Park
2018-04-19 8:42 ` SeongJae Park
2018-04-19 13:55 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-04-19 13:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] atomic_ops.rst: Fix wrong example code Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180419135544.GA26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sj38.park@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.