Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915/psr/bdw+: Enable CRC check in the static frame on the sink side

From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] drm/i915/psr/bdw+: Enable CRC check in the static frame on the sink side
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:16:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180420211655.GF1310@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180418224311.16577-6-jose.souza@intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:43:08PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame and
> compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by
> source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD
> and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR on DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS.

good idea, but first we need to stop using sink crc for the tests :(

and make sure the interrupts are being handled correct...

(I was going to mention an extra requirement that was to make sure
that you implement the needed Wa, but I noticed you already took care
of this)

> 
> Also spec recommends to disable MAX_SLEEP as a trigger to exit PSR when
> CRC check is enabled to improve power savings.

my first impression was that this should be a separated patch
in case we needed to revert it doesn't revert both functionalities...

however I saw this was Display WA #0388 with a mention:
"This becomes standard required programming for all subsequent projects."

so yeah, it belongs here. Maybe good to at least referrence this wa number.

> 
> Spec: 7723
> 
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes from v1:
> - printing a debug message when sink assert a error
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index fb106026a1f4..d3efbd654889 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4016,6 +4016,7 @@ enum {
>  #define   EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT			(1<<12)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL			(0<<11)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL			(1<<11)
> +#define   EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE			(1<<10) /* BDW+ */
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us		(0<<8)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us		(1<<8)
>  #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us		(2<<8)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 558b08a43f9e..1920e7d03e06 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -290,6 +290,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_ENABLE_PSR2;
>  	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
>  		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE;
> +	if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> +		dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, dpcd_val);
>  
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, DP_SET_POWER_D0);
> @@ -377,6 +379,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	else
>  		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL;
>  
> +	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> +		val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE;
> +
>  	val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK;
>  	I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val);
>  }
> @@ -602,10 +607,12 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		 * preventing  other hw tracking issues now we can rely
>  		 * on frontbuffer tracking.
>  		 */
> -		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG,
> -			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> -			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> -			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP);
> +		u32 val = EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP | EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD
> +			  | EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP;
> +
> +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8)
> +			val |= EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP;
> +		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG, val);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -1161,14 +1168,17 @@ void intel_psr_hpd_short_pulse_handle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		goto dpcd_error;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting PSR\n");
> +	if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR | DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) {
> +		if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting PSR\n");
> +		if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, exiting PSR\n");
>  		intel_psr_exit(dev_priv);
>  	}
>  	/* clear status register */
>  	drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, val);
>  
> -	/* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */
> +	/* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */
>  dpcd_error:
>  	intel_psr_schedule_activate_work(dev_priv);
>  not_enabled:
> -- 
> 2.17.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx