From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <bp@suse.de>
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15])	by Galois.linutronix.de with
 esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256)	(Exim 4.80)	(envelope-from
 <bp@suse.de>)	id 1f9y8T-00048q-H4	for speck@linutronix.de; Sat, 21 Apr 2018
 21:25:27 +0200
Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254])
	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FFFADC6
	for <speck@linutronix.de>; Sat, 21 Apr 2018 19:25:18 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 21:25:10 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [patch 07/11] [PATCH v2 07/10] Linux Patch #7
Message-ID: <20180421192509.GD18575@pd.tnic>
References: <20180420022613.270943302@localhost.localdomain>
 <20180420174242.GO13977@pd.tnic>
 <20180421032701.GA4490@localhost.localdomain>
 <20180421090345.GA18575@pd.tnic>
 <20180421122117.GA5337@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180421122117.GA5337@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: speck@linutronix.de
List-ID: <speck.linutronix.de>

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 08:21:17AM -0400, speck for Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wro=
te:
> Perhaps instead of X86_FEATURE_MDD we should set on AMD only this CPU flag:
> 	X86_FEATURE_SSBD
>=20
> And on Intel have both:
> 	X86_FEATURE_MDD
> 	X86_FEATURE_SSBD

I prefer X86_FEATURE_MDD and X86_FEATURE_USE_MDD which is
straight-forward and in line with the other mitigations. And we query
the USE_MDD flag only. The MDD one will be for /proc/cpuinfo and USE_MDD
used by the code.

--=20
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HR=
B 21284 (AG N=C3=BCrnberg)
--=20