From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fACKv-0004Z3-2g for speck@linutronix.de; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 12:35:13 +0200 Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6A9ACB6 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 10:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 12:34:56 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [patch 07/11] [PATCH v2 07/10] Linux Patch #7 Message-ID: <20180422103456.GC32218@pd.tnic> References: <20180421192509.GD18575@pd.tnic> <20180421220903.GE18575@pd.tnic> <20180421223538.GF18575@pd.tnic> <45c96d89-f75b-9770-6032-ca87115a0e0a@redhat.com> <0de04dd1-0f35-dc0e-d27a-dec03ed0f138@redhat.com> <20180422093545.GA32218@pd.tnic> <2c7fa188-cd84-1a10-56cb-358d3f859559@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2c7fa188-cd84-1a10-56cb-358d3f859559@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 05:53:50AM -0400, speck for Jon Masters wrote: > I'd prefer that too. But we had this conversation with Thomas already > and he wanted a "disable" option. It was fairly clearly spelled out that > it was to be "mdd" or "ssbd" and therefore "spec_store_bypass_disable". No, he wants "on,off,auto" so that we're in-line with PTI's and spectre_v2's options. So let's do: spec_store_bypass=3D[on|off|auto] and be done with the bikeshedding. The weather's too nice outside. :-) --=20 Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HR= B 21284 (AG N=C3=BCrnberg) --=20