From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1fAIyw-00036K-AS for speck@linutronix.de; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 19:40:59 +0200 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3MHamvS177169 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 17:40:51 GMT Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2hfvrbjq43-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 17:40:50 +0000 Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w3MHeowt027840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 17:40:50 GMT Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w3MHenSM001367 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 17:40:50 GMT Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 13:40:44 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [patch 0/7] SSB v2.1-jcm Message-ID: <20180422174043.GA8212@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180422093523.048337870@washington.bos.jonmasters.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180422093523.048337870@washington.bos.jonmasters.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 05:35:23AM -0400, speck for jcm_at_redhat.com wrote: > Hi Konrad, > > I've taken the liberty of reworking some of the patches with feedback so far. Thank you. I spent most of the day yesterday and today being outside so appreciate you doing all the work :-) In the future - please mangle the subject of the patches in the git tree as GPG does not encrypt the Subject: header nor the inline GPG (filename=0006-x86-spec_store_bypass-Provide-boot-parameters-to-sel.patch) so all the names of the patches are visible. > Please feel free to do whatever you like with these if it helps you, and > you're the owner of the series so review can wait for your next batch. Tomorrow morning. After I enjoy the rocky beach. > > I didn't include the AMD part. It'll need reworking in any case since you want > to make sure you don't use the X86_FEATURE_MDD like it was. They don't have > that SPEC_CTRL bit. My update adds a synthetic X86_FEATURE_USE_MDD and we > should probably further fix that, and add a similar one for AMD's feature. Borislav wants it to be inline with Intel's MDD so will use the same name. > > The KVM part won't change much so I didn't repost that part either. > > Since v2.0: > - Reworked patches 1-7 with feedback (except for Bosilav's goto comments in #5) > > Jon.